Mail Archive Search: <+from:dahlgren@uconect.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:dahlgren@uconect.net: 166 ]

Total 166 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:57:43 -0400; If the technology is better than a piston engine whats that got to do with anything???? do we have a handicap for a twin cam engine ?? How about a hemi handicap how would that go over.. i think every; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00347.html (8,947 bytes)
62. Re: rotary (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:10:47 -0400; Another good reason not to handicap them so bad..; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00348.html (6,457 bytes)
63. Re: Rotary Engines (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 13:20:12 -0400; Then why do the 2 strokes run heads up.. aren't there some small engine liner records set with 2 strokes that had an unfair advantage?? does FIA also factor them as well?? Dahlgren; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00351.html (9,768 bytes)
64. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:03:54 -0400; To be candid with you a rotary is not like a turbine in that it does not purely rotate. The eccentric shaft gets it forces from the rotor going around a statioary gear in a wobble sort of motion and; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00355.html (8,862 bytes)
65. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:48:27 -0400; heads up might be an advantage but it is an advantage to the 2 strokes to run heads up too.. at 2.1 or 2.0 they would move to an F car.. It seems appropriate that if FIA and SCCA both use a factor of; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00372.html (11,550 bytes)
66. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:25:29 -0400; Dan whether it may or may not bring a car back is not really the question is it?? The question is the factor fair .... The question is how do i present this for a fair consdieration to the factor and; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00374.html (14,810 bytes)
67. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:45:28 -0400; Will do when is the meeting so i am sure to have it to you in time. Does this also have to be done for usfra or do the rules always parallel each other I am not sure to the distriction between SCRA a; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00377.html (17,001 bytes)
68. Re: Outboard Boat Motors (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:11:18 -0400; because they do not adapt real well with a wet exhaust and the displacemnet is huge.. Lottsa cubic inches for the most part..; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00390.html (7,419 bytes)
69. Re: Timing retard devices (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 15:15:03 -0400; Yes...It is a must have part for all to work well..How much nitrous are you using and for how long is the other question.. Dave Dahlgren; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00489.html (7,775 bytes)
70. Re: Tee Shirts (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 06:34:53 -0400; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00522.html (6,579 bytes)
71. Re: Timing and rod length (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 07:37:14 -0400; interesting site but unfortunately anyone that #1 thinks in terms or 'vacuum' in the cylinder does not really get it yet!!!! The mention of good ports heads with no reference to the square inches in; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00030.html (8,830 bytes)
72. Re: Crank Triggered Ignition? (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 07:27:17 -0400; You should set the timing for whatever makes the car run best without the nitrous setup and have the phasing off ever so slightly so that the rotor phasing is correct with the retard in effect for th; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00283.html (9,783 bytes)
73. Re: Fire (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:53:20 -0400; Maybe shoulda put the butt out....... With the number of "un-grounded" cars out there that get fuel poured into them and lines removed and replaced what to you think?? Never saw anyone at the fuel tr; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00316.html (6,769 bytes)
74. Re: MSD Detonation Detector and Cockpit Display Meter (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:13:28 -0400; I will make a small wager that if for the most part if you set the timing to something realistic rather 48 degrees and don't lean it out when the egt's are high and use something that will measure th; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00387.html (12,596 bytes)
75. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 07:51:30 -0400; I am very sure that the amount of ignition advance you run tells you a very important thing about your engine, well two actually. The first and most important thing that I have learned is that there; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00398.html (11,393 bytes)
76. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 13:56:46 -0400; that really explains a lot.. you had no cylinder pressure.. no wonder it wanted so much timing! I am also willing to bet that most times anything that wanted as much timing as you ran has serious mec; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00406.html (18,205 bytes)
77. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 14:02:38 -0400; I was referring to peak pressure as opposed to the burn being done. two different #'s. And yes advancing slowly until peak power is the best bet. On the dyno I usually start with something that sound; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00407.html (15,414 bytes)
78. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 12:57:51 -0400; I suspect the chambers are virtually identical.. The Cosworth does get a little timing hungry above 9800 though made some improvements running 38 degrees there but was pretty dicey. I save that setup; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00433.html (17,923 bytes)
79. Re: Bonneville Transmissions (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:33:09 -0400; I am surprised Keith did not answer this one unless it is his secrect..LOL we changed only the shift points in his car and it went faster at the 3 (203)than it used to go at the 5(197) so I say yes i; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00463.html (8,749 bytes)
80. Re: Bonneville Transmissions (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 10:58:28 -0400; First try at raising them... who ever said we were done there.. :>); /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00471.html (12,603 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]