Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dkern@napanet.net: 150 ]

Total 150 documents matching your query.

61. Re: clutch fork boot (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 18:06:50 -0700
Jim, Thanks for the response. I did not make it clear that the parts book in question covers all models of Oldsmobile, and all years back to about 1950. The number quoted is shown for 61-63 F-85. Re
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-08/msg00009.html (8,088 bytes)

62. RE: clutch fork boot (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:43:12 -0700
Jim, Of course. It is 1353484. This is a 3-volume factory parts book as used by all dealership parts departments at that time. I worked in an Olds-Cadillac agency at that time. That is how I have th
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-08/msg00011.html (9,301 bytes)

63. RE: 215 buying tips (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 16:56:56 -0700
Greg, If the car is a 62, 63, or late 61, you can be reasonably sure the bell housing will be drilled for both the 3-speed (1 pattern) and the 4-speed (different pattern). In very early 61, before t
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-08/msg00012.html (8,034 bytes)

64. Strokers, etc. (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 19:06:41 -0700
This may be a bad time to broach the subject, but I'll go ahead anyhow. Are there any companies left who do welded stroker crankshafts? How about cost? Please don't ask what I am thinking--this is l
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-08/msg00030.html (7,436 bytes)

65. Re: Rover blocks (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:31:38 -0700
John, Excuse my ignorance, but is this "interim" block you speak of a 3.9 or a 4.0? My familiarity is mostly with Buick/Olds blocks and only a little bit with Rovers. In general, what are the specif
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-08/msg00069.html (9,886 bytes)

66. Question responses (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 21:29:14 -0700
Hello everybody, Thanks very much for all the responses to my questions on stroker cranks and 3.9/4.0 Rover blocks. I have not had the time to respond but there were several leads I do intend to fol
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-08/msg00077.html (6,074 bytes)

67. Re: Extrude-Hone on a TR7/8? (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 18:19:01 -0700
Kevin, Very interesting website. Thanks for the lead. I'll bet I am not the only one who has not heard of this process. Cheers, Dave Kernberger **
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-07/msg00003.html (8,761 bytes)

68. Re: Speedo drive on '63 (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:05:48 -0700
My recollection is that all U.S. made speedometers of that time period were calibrated for 1000 revolutions per mile. That means the cable turns 1000 RPM when the car is traveling 60 MPH. The trick
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-07/msg00024.html (7,677 bytes)

69. Re: Heads on a 63 Buick (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 22:25:31 -0700
Jim, You probably cannot use the 300 heads on a Buick engine of only 215 Cubic Inch Displacement because the combustion chambers are so much bigger than those in the original 215 heads. To do so wou
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-07/msg00025.html (9,057 bytes)

70. Re: high performance head gaskets for Buick/Rover V-8 (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 20:52:22 -0700
Everyone, Why not just leave those bolts out altogether????? The Buick 300 worked just fine that way. Regards, Dave K. **
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-07/msg00031.html (10,048 bytes)

71. Re: Nice web site! (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 18:01:54 -0700
** 6/8/00 Greg, Thanks for the link--very interesting (and expensive!!!) project. Am I right that this is from New Zealand? I noticed something on the first closeup view of the combustion chambers th
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-06/msg00006.html (7,468 bytes)

72. Re: Nice web site! (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 18:44:08 -0700
Hello again--same subject as below. Anybody have any information on these spark deflectors? I have only received 1 very short response to this point. I am curious because it looks like they would be
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-06/msg00010.html (7,981 bytes)

73. Re: "Spark deflectors" (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 17:13:35 -0700
Greg, Thanks for the info. Do you suppose this refers to "wetting" with gasoline? That would probably hinder starting since only vaporized fuel can burn, not liquid. More importantly, would the head
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-06/msg00015.html (9,368 bytes)

74. Re: pertronix (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:49:53 -0700
Chris, Try calling Pertronix (California) @ 909/599-5955 or 800/827-3758. I do not know the part number you need but found the people helpful when I called on another matter recently. Incidentally I
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-06/msg00021.html (7,152 bytes)

75. Re: Close but still not done, more questions (Long) (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 19:00:00 -0700
Glenn, All these engines had spin-on filters originally--what kind of adaptor are you talking about? Do you mean the angled one from a V6? Or maybe a remote filter adaptor? How about that as a possi
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-05/msg00000.html (12,002 bytes)

76. Re: Won't Start :-( (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 18:17:42 -0700
Glenn, My thought is that you should be 100% sure of the basics before you worry about an expensive new starter or coasting down a hill you may not even have available. Please excuse me if I am insu
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-05/msg00005.html (10,148 bytes)

77. Re: Distributor, Water Pump, Tach Circuit (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 21:16:24 -0700
Jim, All Olds/Buick 215 distributors are physically interchangeable, but there are many different original Delco-Remy part numbers--presumably due to different details of centrifugal weights, spring
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-05/msg00007.html (8,273 bytes)

78. Re: Bleeding an HTOB (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 21:31:29 -0700
Glenn, For what it is worth, though I have only limited experience with it, my feeling is that vacuum bleeding just doesn't work. It sure didn't when I tried it on my Volvo and Morris Minor brakes,
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-05/msg00009.html (8,000 bytes)

79. Re: which T-10 tranny goes in my 62' Buick Special? (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:15:18 -0700
Jim & Jim, I can shed some light on this one, mostly from personal experience. I bought a very early 61 Olds F-85 new in late 1960. The choice at that point was 3-speed column shift, or automatic, a
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-04/msg00012.html (9,803 bytes)

80. Re: flywheel diet on buick + Q2 (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:13:52 -0700
Jim, I have always used a spare trans input shaft. Any shaft from any tranny that will bolt up will do--it doesn't have to be identical to your exact tranny. T 10, T 5, T 50,--etc.--probably any old
/html/buick-rover-v8/2000-04/msg00017.html (7,324 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu