- 1. FW: carroll shelby (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Sylvester" <jim.sylvester@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:03:52 -0600
- --Original Message-- Why do we insist on calling them Shelby Tigers? They are not Shelby Tigers. Yes, a very interesting car that was a plucky last gasp from a dying company using an ancient chassis
- /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00261.html (7,427 bytes)
- 2. RE: Subject: FW: carroll Shelby (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Sylvester" <jim.sylvester@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:36:04 -0600
- My only disagreement is with Graham's comment of the Tiger's "achieving its potential" only with modifications to push it beyond 164 bhp. By design (worsened by the Tiger's steering configuration), t
- /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00334.html (10,440 bytes)
- 3. RE: Tiger sucess? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Sylvester" <jim.sylvester@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:01:33 -0600
- I don't think of the Tiger as a failure at all! In fact, to whatever degree it was less successful than hoped, it wasn't because of the Tiger's failure but because of Rootes failure (and the failure
- /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00363.html (9,868 bytes)
- 4. RE: Re: Chrysler & the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Sylvester" <jim.sylvester@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:06:27 -0600
- Isn't it self evident?? They weren't SELLING --Original Message-- From: owner-tigers@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-tigers@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of pirouette@charter.net Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2
- /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00417.html (7,518 bytes)
- 5. On the subject of Joey? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Sylvester" <jim.sylvester@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:25:02 -0600
- Call me a cynic, but has anyone ever seen or talked with the person purporting to be Joey? I think you know where I'm going with this line of thought...
- /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00285.html (6,725 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu