Mail Archive Search: <+from:landspeedracer@email.msn.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:landspeedracer@email.msn.com: 837 ]

Total 837 documents matching your query.

181. Wheelbase & Handling (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:47:00 -0500; Did you ever determine the wheel base of the Monza? Cause I think the Firebird is only 101". John -- Original Message -- From: "George Mitchell" <americanpartnerinrussia@starpower.net> To: <kturk@ala; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00152.html (20,269 bytes)
182. Re: Ballast & Handling, Rules & BUCKS (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:54:11 -0500; Hell, Banjo lived about ten min. from here. He was a grumpy old fart most of the time, but he'd talk to me for some reason. I've seen the actual sign over the door, just don't know what Jody did with; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00155.html (7,571 bytes)
183. Re: Question---non LSR (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:08:36 -0500; Now there is a good reason for a Taxpayer Revolt. and to landscaping Fox; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00158.html (7,782 bytes)
184. Re: modified sports (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:11:36 -0500; You can chop it. My question is: Whats the difference between the drag of the roll cage vs the increased frontal area of the choped hard top w/windshield? John Beckett -- Original Message -- From: "D; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00159.html (8,993 bytes)
185. Re: Wheelbase & Handling (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:19:24 -0500; Suprisingly the '82 to '92 Camaros and Firebird wheelbase is short, I believe only 101". Keith's early Camaro is 108". JB -- Original Message -- From: "George Mitchell" <americanpartnerinrussia@starp; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00160.html (22,612 bytes)
186. Re: Wheelbase & Handling (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:27:09 -0500; My old Chevette was 120" WB and it handled just fine. Would have no qualms about running 300 MPH in that car. So a longer WB makes it more stable than what? #265 seems to do just fine with less than; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00161.html (24,949 bytes)
187. Re: Convertible Vs Roadster (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 19:03:46 -0500; I thought a convertible had roll up door windows and a roadster didn't. John Beckett -- Original Message -- From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net> To: "The Backus's" <34ford@email.msn.com>; <FastmetalBDF; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00173.html (9,677 bytes)
188. Re: Ballast & Handling (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:37:26 -0500; Among other things don't the '93 and up Firebirds have a greater frontal area than the older versions? Increased frontal area may have a bigger effect than just a larger hole in the air. John Beckett; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00189.html (9,007 bytes)
189. Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor......... (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:06:18 -0500; I believe that I have weighed in on this subject already. But I think Dave would like a final show of hands. So here goes again. Basically I have thought the x3 factor for rotary engines is excessive; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00203.html (13,776 bytes)
190. Re: Dan Warner (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 17:58:05 -0500; Pretty easy process for the ECTA we, for the most part, follow the SCTA We could very easily change the factor on the Rotary's as an example, but we don't want to be running off in some other directi; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00223.html (20,702 bytes)
191. Rules procedures (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:23:45 -0500; I should have added this to my earlier comments on ECTA procedures. ECTA now has a voice on the SCTA rules committee, thanks to Dan Warner. It's one of a dozen or more voices, but at least we have an; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00227.html (22,486 bytes)
192. Rear Engine Ts (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:30:58 -0500; Putting the handling issue aside for a moment. From what I can see most of the old rear engined T's of the 1950's lacked a great deal of safety equipment...roll bars for example. Doubt if there was m; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00290.html (12,208 bytes)
193. Re: Bravo for the Teacher!!! (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:33:35 -0500; 'Johnboy' 'Ozzie'; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00291.html (10,102 bytes)
194. Re: Sprite (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 08:49:25 -0500; Good work Doug, and here's hoping you have a successful adventure in Australia. It's a dream of mine, to some day get there also.; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00355.html (7,345 bytes)
195. Re: Rotary Factor - Rule Change (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 08:55:04 -0500; No the E/BGT at 238 and the E/GT at 183 are held by Wankles. Both Racing Beat entries. John -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> To: <Flowbench@aol.com> Cc: <mmanghel@hug; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00356.html (9,268 bytes)
196. Re: Two strokes (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 08:58:04 -0500; Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense to me. On the one hand your saying we run 2-cycles heads up no factors and that's OK, but on the other hand you want to factor rotaries times three!! I guess I; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00358.html (9,154 bytes)
197. Arm restraints (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:00:43 -0500; The rule book states that NASCAR nets are approved as primary arm restraints on vehicles under 175 MPH. And that limb restrains shall be the primary restraint system in vehicles over 175 MPH. My que; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00424.html (6,673 bytes)
198. Re: Another great idea from the guy that brought you 300 (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:50:50 -0500; Don't the Motorcycle guys have a deal like this? I think its a .020" over bore beyond maximum displacement for the class. This would allow the 302's that your talking about. Also think its good for; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00468.html (14,451 bytes)
199. Re: Another great idea from the guy that brought you 300 (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 20:24:35 -0500; Now if that cast iron 2.87" crank will hold up to 9,000 RPM, that would be a super motor. -- Original Message -- From: "DOUG ODOM" <popms@thegrid.net> To: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> Cc: "Ri; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00492.html (17,170 bytes)
200. Re: Additives (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:58:50 -0500; It was my understanding the synthitic oils of any kind are a NO NO in new componets. They do not allow the proper break-in to take place, and should only be used in components after the normal break-; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00527.html (10,830 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]