Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:marka@telerama.com: 707 ]

Total 707 documents matching your query.

241. Re: Female participation help (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:49:43 -0500 (EST)
As opposed to, say, creating an entire class structure outside of the normal one for women? Mark (thwack, thwack!)
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00200.html (8,798 bytes)

242. RE: Disclaimer: Underwire Bras (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:48:56 -0500 (EST)
Personally, I think the "no bras allowed" rule would certainly help participation. Mark (In fact, if you really wanna get autox on tv, say it with me now... "Stripper Autocross!" :-)
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00234.html (8,740 bytes)

243. Re: Re:2001 rule books? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:06:36 -0500 (EST)
I'd be willing to bet that's a limitation of the Acrobat reader vs. the document itself. If you wanna pony up the bucks for the Acrobat editor stuff (which lets you create .pdf's) I bet it can do th
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00267.html (8,761 bytes)

244. Re: Female participation help (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:08:08 -0500 (EST)
Maybe I like Ladies classes after all. Mark
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00269.html (8,013 bytes)

245. RE: Female participation help (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:22:33 -0500 (EST)
Woohoo! Still got the old touch! Mark
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00273.html (7,642 bytes)

246. Re: 2001 rule books? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:11:08 -0500 (EST)
Because, of course, no user's actually use the incomprehensible Unix systems. Mark
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00282.html (8,437 bytes)

247. I need to attend travel anonymous... (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:16:00 -0500 (EST)
So it looks like I'm gonna spend about half the time between the end of March and July in San Francisco. I noticed that there are two ProSolo's out there during that time... Is the Arrive & Drive pr
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00293.html (6,536 bytes)

248. Re: WRX Options (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:25:58 -0500 (EST)
Its in GS in my book! :-) Would this include options like the 17x7 wheels? They're subaru specific BBS wheels that everything lists as an option, but the dealer apparently installs (guessing, as you
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00432.html (7,322 bytes)

249. Re: What's the best 14" street tire for max performance for (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:24:49 -0500 (EST)
I have the 205/60 AVS's on my '95 DOHC ACR. They aren't bad and generate decent grip, but you can certainly feel the sidewall flex. For my next set, I was gonna try some with a shorter sidewall, sou
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00479.html (7,656 bytes)

250. Re: The crash (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:31:08 -0500 (EST)
www.nascar.com (they have a clip of the crash) www.cnn.com www.reuters.com Probably a bunch other as well. Mark
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00501.html (6,633 bytes)

251. Re: <sigh> Dale Earnhardt (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:38:30 -0500 (EST)
Lets not jump on that bandwagon too quick. Everyone's saying either "massive chest injuries" or "a blow to the back of the skull" as the cause of death. The doctor / emt at the press conference cata
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00502.html (8,325 bytes)

252. Re: [kcautox] Re: <sigh> Dale Earnhardt (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 21:07:18 -0500 (EST)
I dunno the stats on Nascar deaths. I do know that you've got people strapped into steel cages going 180+ mph, basically exactly the same as they've had for the last 10 or more years. Rather than fo
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00504.html (8,412 bytes)

253. Re: NASCAR officials say Earnhardt's belt ripped (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 10:58:43 -0500 (EST)
I find it sad that folks feel free to completely believe some unknown motor sports writer without question, but can't seem to find a way to give the sanctioning body at least some benefit of the dou
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00625.html (10,166 bytes)

254. Re: NASCAR officials say Earnhardt's belt ripped (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:49:38 -0500 (EST)
When you state "NASCAR has no travelling medical team" you're (I assume) definately stating a fact. What you haven't done is show that not having a travelling medical team is any less safe. Just out
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00634.html (10,963 bytes)

255. RE: NASCAR officials say Earnhardt's belt ripped (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:58:39 -0500 (EST)
And, of course, the only acceptable outcome of research is changes, right? What if the research shows that there's no perceptible difference among the options? Ok, everyone keeps comparing NASCAR sa
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00635.html (12,403 bytes)

256. RE: NASCAR officials say Earnhardt's belt ripped (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 22:52:16 -0500 (EST)
You make good points on all this stuff. I'm not gonna argue with any of them, but I do have a question. ? I thought one of the key points of an SA helmet vs. an M helmet was that it could absorb mul
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00640.html (11,733 bytes)

257. RE: NASCAR officials say Earnhardt's belt ripped (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 00:30:01 -0500 (EST)
That made my head hurt. "Lack of a rule" wasn't the issue. It was "what safety devices is NASCAR prohibiting". I pretty much completely disagree with this. NASCAR should certainly not prevent folks
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00642.html (11,186 bytes)

258. Re: Car Classifications (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 09:45:15 -0500 (EST)
Its classed in CS. There's a proposed re-structuring of the classes out there, but that has been confirmed by the SCCA as not being adopted for the 2001 season. Other cars in CS (that seem competiti
/html/autox/2001-01/msg00028.html (7,794 bytes)

259. Re: Car Classifications (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:51:12 -0500 (EST)
Yeah, I should have clarified that the list was "regionally competitive cars" primarily. Lately it seems you need an MR2 to win nationals and if you're good you can trophy at nationals in a 1.6 miat
/html/autox/2001-01/msg00035.html (8,151 bytes)

260. Re: Eastern USA? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 12:12:38 -0500 (EST)
Like I know where any of these regions really are, but what about the Philly area place where there's been a couple McKamey/Evolution schools? Or maybe that was New Jersey? Heck, I dunno. Had a nice
/html/autox/2001-01/msg00106.html (8,302 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu