Mail Archive Search: <+from:marka@telerama.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:marka@telerama.com: 707 ]

Total 707 documents matching your query.

61. Re: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:07:45 -0400 (EDT); And if _that guy_ wants to talk about how easy it was and how much all the class competitors suck, he at least has some basis from which to do it. Mark /// unsubscribe/change address requests to maj; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00068.html (8,832 bytes)
62. Re: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:35:51 -0400 (EDT); My hopes? Objective Numbers? What do you know about either of those? I'm building a CP car because I find it to be a challenge both on the engineering side and on the driving side. My "hope" is that; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00076.html (9,963 bytes)
63. RE: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:12:49 -0400 (EDT); I'll say it again Jeff. Build a car and come run CP. Until then you're just another moron with an opinion and a keyboard. If its as easy as you seem to think it is, just run your existing car in CP; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00082.html (9,337 bytes)
64. RE: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:22:59 -0400 (EDT); We'll leave alone that we're only using one event... 1st, you'll notice that the two BSP cars you mention (I'm lumping Tunnell's car into BSP where it got moved to) have an IRS and ABS (assuming the; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00083.html (10,493 bytes)
65. RE: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:41:01 -0400 (EDT); When's the last time someone in CP protested somebody? Seriously, I'd like to know. Not to mention that in the situation you describe the car would be legal. Mark /// unsubscribe/change address requ; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00091.html (9,157 bytes)
66. RE: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:54:32 -0400 (EDT); M3's are live axle rear suspension? Really? The ones I've driven sure as hell had an independent rear suspension. Is this another one of your "facts"? And CP cars (some of them) can have _stock_ ABS; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00093.html (10,531 bytes)
67. RE: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 17:08:33 -0400 (EDT); What does your car weigh? What motor? The rule makes plenty of sense. Go price some 17" slicks (if you can find them), along with three sets of rims for everyone who's serious. You don't have to lik; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00097.html (9,621 bytes)
68. RE: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 18:46:40 -0400 (EDT); Then you're legal. 15% weight penalty from 2700 + 50 lbs == 3155. Ok, so you gotta fill the tank. :-) No, we listen fine. That idea is idiotic. How does it benefit the competitor to have to test DOT; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00103.html (9,686 bytes)
69. RE: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 22:50:15 -0400 (EDT); I'm confused. First you're whining that you're not legal in CP with your ESP car. Now you're whining that you _are_ legal, but not competitive... In your under-prepared car. Do I have that right? Yo; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00108.html (11,178 bytes)
70. RE: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:38:49 -0400 (EDT); Jeff, you can state whatever you'd like, but the fact remains that your car is legal now. Well, sorry, you'd have to add 15 lbs or whatever. Like I said, fill up the tank. And apparently it isn't th; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00115.html (9,702 bytes)
71. Re: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:51:15 -0400 (EDT); But all you have to do is take the weight penalty for having an "in excess" car (TransAm cars run or used to run 17" wheels, right?) and you're legal. So you get a 10% penalty for aftermarket / modi; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00118.html (9,422 bytes)
72. Re: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:25:36 -0400 (EDT); My god you are one stubborn son of a bitch. Did it ever occur to you that I might be pretty damned familier with the Prepared section rules? Look at item 25 in the solo tech bulletins at http://www.; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00123.html (9,743 bytes)
73. Re: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:45:31 -0400 (EDT); Here's a hint Jeff. The words "up to" in the first sentence there are pretty key. Why are you arguing (incorrectly) so vehmently that you're illegal? What point are you trying to prove? You don't ne; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00125.html (9,044 bytes)
74. Re: [evolution-disc.] SS getting DSQ'ed /video tapes allowed (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:46:22 -0400 (EDT); This is the part I never really understood. I can see impound needing to check stickers and such, but finishing position doesn't matter for that. Once the "regular" impound checks are done (particul; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00181.html (8,239 bytes)
75. Hey TireRack! (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:19:44 -0400 (EDT); Is it just my imagination or is there no way to look at tires by manufacturer & model at Tirerack's site? Often times I'm looking at tirerack to see what sizes a particular tire comes in. Having to; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00286.html (7,030 bytes)
76. One last Phase II spot at BeaveRun! (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:34:24 -0400 (EDT); We have one final phase II spot for this Sunday's evolution phase II at BeaveRun. Cost is $200, which includes lunch, and you must have taken a phase I course in the past. Please send me email if in; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00365.html (6,769 bytes)
77. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Two Driver Run Order 2002 Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:56:31 -0400 (EDT); You know, I've been on these lists for awhile too. I've seen stupid questions and good questions. All the grid questions I saw were good ones and ones that I wondered about myself when I read the pr; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00476.html (9,900 bytes)
78. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Two Driver Run Order 2002 Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 20:00:57 -0400 (EDT); I think one of Tyson's points is that the system we use should be able to handle co-drivers seamlessly, not lump them into the "sh*t" happening category. After all, we already know we're gonna have; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00490.html (9,984 bytes)
79. Re: Slotted and/or drilled rotors for '86 Civic Si? (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 10:34:04 -0400 (EDT); Depends on your goal. If your goal is to look phat, I'd recommend slotted. A little less common than crossdrilling. If your goal is performance, I'd recommend neither. Slotting and crossdrilling was; /html/autox/2002-07/msg00004.html (7,017 bytes)
80. Re: Wireless autocross timing equipment? (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:48:30 -0400 (EDT); I'm sure he'd be able to use a random number generator to show those 3rd and 4th digits for you, if that'll make you feel better... Mark /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.te; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00134.html (9,606 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]