Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:raknotts@qwest.net: 593 ]

Total 593 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [oletrucks] Black Chrome. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 11:16:05 -0700
Chuck, do you have stock shocks? I wonder if HD shocks would help on the bouncing? It sounds like you've answered my question though. Thanks. And thanks to everybody who answered. Bob K all pick-up.
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00081.html (13,753 bytes)

262. Re: [oletrucks] Speed Limit, was Black Chrome (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 17:01:32 -0700
I'm sure I would go to a big six (292 or 302) with a 700R4 auto o/d transmission, and probably a newer diff. Bob K in PHX, AZ. -- Original Message -- From: "Christian Pointer" <kissaki@highstream.net
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00084.html (9,147 bytes)

263. Re: [oletrucks] Speed Limit, was Black Chrome (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 18:24:34 -0700
I LOVE Seattle traffic during rush hour. Not that Portland's much better. Especially the Sunset Highway-It's the same size it was (Two lanes each way) as it was when I went to school in Beaverton in
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00086.html (10,006 bytes)

264. Re: [oletrucks] Speed Limit, was Black Chrome (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 19:18:01 -0700
I remember in the days they were in Chevy/GMC pick ups originally, they were said to be hard on gas. What kind of mileage do you get? I wonder what I'd get with a warmed up version and an O/D transmi
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00089.html (8,659 bytes)

265. Re: [oletrucks] speed limit (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 22:24:39 -0700
Maybe he was going down a R-E-A-L-L-Y long hill. There's one in SE Portland. Mt. Tabor, I think. We used to go down hill there on our bikes. Don't know how fast we went. My speedometer pegged at 50.
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00098.html (8,847 bytes)

266. Re: [oletrucks] speed limit (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 08:13:04 -0700
Down. Hey, I was abt 12 or 13. All I knew were up and down! Bob K in PHX, downhills <64bowtie@quik.com>; Portland. turn about do oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 195
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00107.html (10,149 bytes)

267. Re: [oletrucks] new look for '54 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 09:29:21 -0700
RT, I WISH it were only 10 lbs. I think if a person REALLY wants a low rig, the air suspension would be the way to go. You basically have the best of both worlds, as I understand it. I think I would
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00126.html (10,942 bytes)

268. Re: [oletrucks] Speed Limit, was Black Chrome (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 10:32:00 -0700
I've talked to a company in Ca., they tell me they have put 700's on just abt everything, even rigs we don't talk abt here. Bob K -- Original Message -- From: "G. L. Perry" <glperry@fwi.com> To: "Bob
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00130.html (10,744 bytes)

269. Re: [oletrucks] new look for '54 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 10:48:26 -0700
Wayne, I just looked at your webpage. I think you did alright as far as cost. I'm sure it hurt to pay out the $800 for the frame work, but unless you're close to being an expert, I think safety deman
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00135.html (11,554 bytes)

270. Re: [oletrucks] OD transmission (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 12:29:25 -0700
Kurt, I don't know what engine you have, but the 700R4 is non electronic. And there is also a 200R4, which is smaller, and not as strong. And there are companies who will also sell you stand alone el
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00138.html (7,802 bytes)

271. [oletrucks] off subject (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 12:33:35 -0700
I'm thinking abt building a small camper, and using laminated honeycomb material for the top and sides. Anybody have any experience or suggestions? (I'll tow it with my future GMC, so it has to be li
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00139.html (6,492 bytes)

272. Re: [oletrucks] off subject , campers (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 18:41:34 -0700
bad. Easy to there for them. suggestions? oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00154.html (7,603 bytes)

273. Re: [oletrucks] How low is too low? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 18:44:23 -0700
Now, if they'd spend some time on the big 4 X 4's that have headlights engineered to shine right in your eyeballs via your rearview mirror. Bob K -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Bailey" <billb1@mi
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00155.html (9,603 bytes)

274. Re: [oletrucks] teerdrop traler behind truck (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 11:42:40 -0700
chek out the howto secshon. look for the accessorys heading and choos "traler for two" http://53truck.ez15loan.com/index2.htm oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00177.html (7,550 bytes)

275. Re: [oletrucks] off topic??? for those always wanting a bigger (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 17:42:23 -0700
And I thought the CUMMINS 5.9 was good!!! Bob K -- Original Message -- From: <mark@noakes.com> To: <napco4x4@yahoogroups.com>; <oletrucks@autox.team.net> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 3:59 PM Subject:
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00193.html (8,462 bytes)

276. Re: [oletrucks] off topic??? for those always wanting a bigger (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 22:47:14 -0700
It looked more like a huge electrical powerplant engine, but you might be right abt the tanker. Bob K -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@oldsub.com> To: <Wdonohoe1@aol.com>; <mark@no
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00195.html (9,141 bytes)

277. Re: [oletrucks] off topic??? for those always wanting a bigger (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 09:59:19 -0700
Didn't they say it ran at 101 rpm? Wouldn't shake much at that speed!! Bob K -- Original Message -- From: "Mark Self" <mark.self@verizon.net> To: "'Steve Hanberg'" <steve@OldSub.com>; <Wdonohoe1@aol.
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00204.html (9,789 bytes)

278. Re: [oletrucks] t-shirt (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 09:20:05 -0700
I thought that was a test to see if we were still here! Bob K oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00251.html (7,211 bytes)

279. Re: [oletrucks] Another Progress Report (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 21:00:16 -0700
left. oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00263.html (7,780 bytes)

280. Re: [oletrucks] another t-shirt one.. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 09:28:36 -0700
didn't best all oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
/html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00279.html (9,263 bytes)

Current List: 261 - 280
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu