Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov: 89 ]

Total 89 documents matching your query.

1. Re: The Inside Story (#6) (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 11:07:32 -0400 (EDT)
Regarding Larry's progress report: I personally viewed the garage queen this past weekend. Larry does in fact have liberal amounts of the metal foil covered dynamat covering generous expanses of his
/html/tigers/1997-04/msg00238.html (8,298 bytes)

2. Bye for now ( no Sunbeam content ) (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 12:52:28 -0400 (EDT)
Time marches on..... After more than 11 years managing our Computer Aided Manufacturing facility here, I'm moving on to another challenge. Same agency ( even the same building ) but I've opted out of
/html/tigers/1997-04/msg00241.html (7,883 bytes)

3. Jan S-E Harde (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 15:05:31 -0400 (EDT)
I triedresponding to your message but it keeps bouncing. Rick
/html/tigers/1997-04/msg00260.html (6,493 bytes)

4. Test for Mark Olson (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 16:44:52 -0500 (EST)
Here's the test message I promised you. Rick
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00038.html (6,216 bytes)

5. The trouble with TAC / Call for consensus and sanity. (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 12:11:00 -0500 (EST)
Regarding TAC, Andy Walker makes the following observations: a higher in the mid-section of the country? Seems though Andy's dissatisfaction with TAC centers around it's apparent "non availability" t
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00107.html (13,290 bytes)

6. Re[2]: Where does one draw the line? / Trouble with TAC... (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 15:34:22 -0500 (EST)
NOTE: I'm gonna be away from this address for the next three days. I would invite, and appreciate, anyone who is discussing this matter further to pop me a copy at: amyf@pop.erols.com. Thanks, Rick.
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00114.html (9,637 bytes)

7. Simply silly ( was simply amazing ) (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:44:17 -0500 (EST)
Regarding Paul R's comments: TAC bashing ?? How about difference of opinion , that'd be more accurate . Somehow I don't think a persons status as TAC inspector should exclude them from scrutiny. Part
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00184.html (11,823 bytes)

8. You don't HAVE to TAC... (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 16:28:20 -0500 (EST)
It keeps coming up again and again. "Hey, whatcha guys bitchin' about ?? This program is voluntary. You don't _ HAVE_ to TAC. Nobody's forcing you........etc.......etc......" The implication is that
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00186.html (8,014 bytes)

9. THANKS (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 16:52:11 -0500 (EST)
Thanks to the "list keepers" for not intervening or limiting discussion of the latest hot topic. It's nice to know , whether an opinion is popular... or not..., that it can be expressed here.
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00187.html (6,291 bytes)

10. Got Gas ? ( No TAC content ) (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 13:54:10 -0500 (EST)
Soliciting help from fellow Sunbeamers. We just had natural gas installed in our neighborhood. As I type this, our local utility company is setting and installing a gas meter, and putting the finishi
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00230.html (7,328 bytes)

11. Setting the record straight (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 08:19:44 -0500 (EST)
Regarding my earlier posting: Tom Halls posting stated that this WAS in fact one of the desired outcomes..... And Tom Hall's response: Tom, you're right, and you're not. I agree, with you in the sens
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00254.html (7,968 bytes)

12. Re :A simple solution ! ! (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 08:45:43 -0500 (EST)
Tom, your simple solution is great for the specialized group of people "who just wanna have fun...etc. " However it does nothing for those of us who would like , if we're gonna have a certification p
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00255.html (8,296 bytes)

13. Worst fears confirmed (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 09:47:55 -0500 (EST)
Some things are predictable. Before I ever sent the "Trouble with TAC / Call for Consensus" message, I just KNEW that, as someone who takes exception to TAC as it exists, ......that. sooner or later,
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00257.html (13,282 bytes)

14. Bo Cheadle (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 11:37:59 -0500 (EST)
Bo Cheadle. I tried sending you a message, but it keeps bouncing. What's your e-mail address ?
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00263.html (6,220 bytes)

15. RE: Worst fears confirmed (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:07:56 -0500 (EST)
Thanks for the response. Yeah, Tom Hall alluded to this very fact, and I must admit that if I see any real roadblock to making this happen, it would be the logistics nightmare of trying to tie toget
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00266.html (9,328 bytes)

16. W.F.C. part 2 ( Worst Fears Confirmed ) (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:49:32 -0500 (EST)
Re: Vonski's comments: " Lastly, for Rick-Should you attempt to inspect/register a car without vin tags, it will be impounded as a possible stolen vehicle...... <snip> ........... Oh, sometimes they
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00273.html (8,260 bytes)

17. Gearing down / IMHO choices (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 17:27:34 -0500 (EST)
This is the last piece I intend to post on this subject. I've enjoyed all the viewpoints expressed on the "hot" topic this past week, even with those whom I personally disagree with. IMHO, if I were
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00278.html (8,272 bytes)

18. stress ( No TAC content ) (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 12:07:19 -0500 (EST)
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00293.html (9,127 bytes)

19. Pointy fin ponderings. (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 08:52:54 -0500 (EST)
...based on a discussion I had with another Sunbeam enthusiast awhile back.......... which centered around what particular characteristics we found appealing ( or not ) over the various years of chan
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00395.html (7,020 bytes)

20. Brake booster questions (score: 1)
Author: Rick Fedorchak <richard.fedorchak@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 16:22:01 -0500 (EST)
A while back , there was some discussion on power brake boosters. Seems there was a company ( maybe more than one ? ) that offered remote power brake boosters that could replace the Sunbeam unit, tho
/html/tigers/1997-03/msg00481.html (7,030 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu