- 1. "K" vs "HP" (score: 1)
- Author: "Edmund E. Powell" <102430.3640@CompuServe.COM>
- Date: 30 May 96 12:00:20 EDT
- Okay. Laugh if you must, but someone please tell me what this is all about. I've seen references to 289 HP and HiPo, which I think are the same, and 289 K engines. What are you cats talking about? Do
- /html/tigers/1996-05/msg00292.html (7,514 bytes)
- 2. Re: "K" vs "HP" (score: 1)
- Author: Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 96 8:54:50 PDT
- The K or HiPo series 289 has several differences from the stock 289: beefier main caps beefier connecting rods with 3/8" bolts (rather than 5/16") heads have screw-in rocker studs, different porting
- /html/tigers/1996-05/msg00303.html (8,403 bytes)
- 3. Re: "K" vs "HP" (score: 1)
- Author: Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 96 10:33:11 PDT
- And another question: do any of the lead substitutes really work? I've head that none of them do anything except gum things up. Note I said substitutes. Adding MEL doesn't count, since it's not avai
- /html/tigers/1996-05/msg00304.html (7,491 bytes)
- 4. Re[2]: "K" vs "HP" (score: 1)
- Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com
- Date: Fri, 31 May 96 10:59:29 PST
- -Right after purchasing our TIGER, I went by my "local" 76 station & there were some, older faded bottles labeled "lead substitute". Reading the fine print, they contained MEL, so obviously pre-date
- /html/tigers/1996-05/msg00305.html (9,105 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu