Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"New\"\s+67\s+MGB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"New\"\s+67\s+MGB\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. "New" 67 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Tony Woodruff" <tonyw@mailmedia.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 07:15:24 -0700; Wanted to offer thanks to those of you that offered advice, last evening I purchased a 67 MGB Roadster. Now I have a question for the group. I believe the engine to be original to the car, but the nu; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg01172.html (7,846 bytes)
2. RE: "New" 67 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Steve Conley" <swconley@foxinternet.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 08:48:25 -0700; According to my sources the 18GB engine went from Fall '64 to 10/67 & from Space isn't remote at all. It's only an hour's drive away if your car could go straight upwards. -Sir Fred Hoyle, British As; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg01179.html (8,676 bytes)
3. RE: "New" 67 MGB (score: 1): Author: ya632@victoria.tc.ca (artworks@bigfoot.com) (Paul Nelson); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 12:15:58 -0700; 68640 I pulled out of a '67 GT. Paul Nelson; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg01203.html (7,462 bytes)
4. Re: "New" 67 MGB (score: 1): Author: Ericsmgs@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 16:44:27 EDT; The quickest way to tell if the engine is a 3-main is by the presence of a mechanical tachometer drive. All 3 mains used in MGB's had them. If it is there, it is located on the drivers side at the b; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg01209.html (7,398 bytes)
5. Re: "New" 67 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Tony Woodruff" <tonyw@mailmedia.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 14:51:47 -0700; Thank you to everyone. I found a great web site (you all probably know of it) that lists the Car numbers, what they mean and the engine numbers and what they mean. If anybody cares to visit, it's at; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg01212.html (7,914 bytes)
6. Re: "New" 67 MGB (score: 1): Author: John Walker <john@rmartin.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 14:58:57 -0700; Once again a new guy realizes that Skye's web site is probably the best MG site period. -JW numbers, what they mean and the engine numbers and what they mean. If anybody cares to visit, it's at the b; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg01213.html (8,441 bytes)
7. Re: "New" 67 MGB (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 15:23:10 -0700; No, the numbers aren't supposed to match. But your numbers are both correct for an early 67 roadster. You can apply for a BMH certificate to confirm the engine number that left the factory in your ca; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg01222.html (8,725 bytes)
8. Re: "New" 67 MGB (score: 1): Author: "David F. Darby" <darby@tri-lakes.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 23:34:00 -0500; Hello Tony et al.: FWIW my '67 GT was (probably) built Nov. or Dec. of 1966 and has its original engine. It is car number 110229 and engine number (GB) 62440, so it would appear that your engine is o; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg01236.html (7,391 bytes)
9. Re: "New" 67 MGB (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 17:02:14 +0100; Clausager quotes the following: Car No 79362 was the first built in Jan 66, and Car No 111418 was the first built in Jan 67. Engine No 18GB-U-H 44413 was built in Jun 66, and Engine No 18GB-U-H56047; /html/mgs/1999-09/msg01285.html (8,924 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]