Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"Rover\s+may\s+be\s+a\s+Triumph\"\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. "Rover may be a Triumph" (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 18:38:12 EST
Issue: Weds 1st March 2000. News Page (pg.11) Headline: "Rover may be a Triumph" Exclusive: BMW may axe the Rover name and start building Triumph-badged family cars. A senior source at BMW claims it
/html/triumphs/2000-03/msg00420.html (11,074 bytes)

2. Re: "Rover may be a Triumph" (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 02:29:42 -0700
Sterling wasn't the problem; British Leyland was, and their legacy continues to be BMW's problem. Moreover, if BMW wished to sell Rovers in this country, they jolly well should have bellied up to the
/html/triumphs/2000-03/msg00438.html (10,068 bytes)

3. Re: "Rover may be a Triumph" (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 07:12:55 -0500
Given that most of us have had our Triumphs called a "nice MG" more than once, it seems clear that the MG name has more recognition than Triumph to the average American. Cheers, John Lye rjl6n@Virgin
/html/triumphs/2000-03/msg00441.html (7,698 bytes)

4. RE: "Rover may be a Triumph" (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 10:51:07 -0500 charset="iso-8859-1"
Spot On! With all respect to those who enjoy the old Rovers, ( good cars, indeed,) the name simply won't cut it in today's image oriented/slogan driven marketplace. The car's name is too closely asso
/html/triumphs/2000-03/msg00449.html (8,227 bytes)

5. Re: "Rover may be a Triumph" (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:24:14 -0500
The Opinions following only relate to the U.S. Well if they tied Rover cars and Land Rovers together they would have a good name recognition. The problem with any british name in the states is the re
/html/triumphs/2000-03/msg00450.html (7,357 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu