Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"the\s+MGB\s+was\s+an\s+awful\s+car\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"the\s+MGB\s+was\s+an\s+awful\s+car\"\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: "Hutmacher, Greg" <ghutmacher@stanleyworks.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 09:48:34 -0500; Excellent point, Karl. That's excatly what I was thinking as I followed this thread. I'm new to MG's although I've had three TR6's. I'm currently restoring a 68 MGB/GT that I received already strippe; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00014.html (10,724 bytes)
2. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: "Dennis Berman" <dberman@nortelnetworks.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 08:51:23 -0600; [snip] [bandwidth saved!] Oh, *this* was rich. As often as a study is cultivated by narrow minds, they will draw from it narrow conclusions. One's perception is one's reality. Damn proud of my littl; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00017.html (7,378 bytes)
3. RE: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: John Steczkowski <stecz@Crossroads.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 09:37:52 -0600; Although my '75 MGB hasn't been "trouble free". It has been reliable. I bought it almost two years ago and the only things I've HAD to do to it are, push the bulb for the high beam indicator back in; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00020.html (12,985 bytes)
4. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 10:32:16 -0800; EXACTLY. Skye -- 1966 MGB The MGB Experience __,__\__ Safety Fast! GHN3L-70307 http://www.mgb.bc.ca/ (_o____o_) MGOFR 1.375; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg00037.html (7,058 bytes)
5. "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: Eric Erickson <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 06:16:46 +0000; Before you say it... NO, I don't search around for articles that say how horrible the MG is! What I do enjoy is generating a little debate where I learn a great deal when those "in-the-know" pass com; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01810.html (8,989 bytes)
6. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: Lec089@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 16:41:19 EST; << A decade old in the early 1970s, the B was, by the generally low standards of the day, poorly engineered, maintenance intensive, often unreliable, rather slow and quite uncomfortable. >> That's no; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01813.html (7,459 bytes)
7. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: Pointparty@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 16:44:32 EST; << e may not want to admit it publicly, but you can see he knows the MGB was an awful car. A decade old in the early 1970s, the B was, by the generally low standards of the day, poorly engineered, ma; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01814.html (8,378 bytes)
8. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: Eric Erickson <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 07:20:19 +0000; Just one comment... notice that the author of the article puts the words into McGovern's mouth... he never actually said this! Eric '68MGB MkII; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01815.html (7,250 bytes)
9. RE: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: Phil Vanner <pvanner@pclink.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 16:31:36 -0600; It also appears that the author has never himself owned an MGB - nor does he acknowledge the existence of any other type of MG. Midget, RV8 etc. He spouts a prejudicial opinion and then, later, reinf; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01817.html (8,791 bytes)
10. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 21:08:36 EST; Yep, they must have been absolutely terrible. Certainly if they were fine and fun and a general delight they would not have been produced for 18 years and 500,000 would never have been made. How does; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01831.html (7,954 bytes)
11. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: Karl Shultz <karl.shultz@ibm.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 03:39:18 +0000; I agree 100 percent...they're (MGBs and other MGs) great cars. BUT...if joe average were to look at the traffic on this list, he'd go running for shelter. Especially the stories about Lucas, which I; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01837.html (9,699 bytes)
12. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: H4aardvrk@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 00:26:55 EST; << hat's not true! Mine are comfortable! Harry 71B 72B 73B 59A >> harry, all of mine are just fine too..:-) H4(Howard) 1974MG-Bgt 1974MG-B roadster 1976MG-B roadster (But then again, I am not too tal; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01847.html (7,520 bytes)
13. Re: "the MGB was an awful car" (score: 1): Author: H4aardvrk@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 00:35:18 EST; << ost people aren't into cars, period. And an MG (an A, a T, a B, whatever) requires more TLC than most. That woris always rewarded IMO, but the average middle-age-crisis person who wants a car with; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01849.html (7,777 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]