Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\'63\s+vs\.\s+\'68\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\'63\s+vs\.\s+\'68\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. '63 vs. '68 (score: 1): Author: Kevin Smith <ksmith40@centurytel.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:52:58 -0600; This is long. Sorry. Here's the rub: A local business just off the interstate always seems to have their rear garage door open when I drive by. They also have an MGB siting in said doorway. I had bee; /html/mgs/2004-11/msg00172.html (9,288 bytes)
2. Re: '63 vs. '68 (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:21:43 -0000; My 2 penn'orth. It would be sacrilege to cut up a 63, only slightly less so a 68. At the end of the day it all depends on what the 68 means to you. Personally I wouldn't trade my car (the year is imm; /html/mgs/2004-11/msg00175.html (7,506 bytes)
3. Re: '63 vs. '68 (score: 1): Author: Carl French <leylandauto@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 03:22:49 -0800 (PST); I know the body work is daunting but if you can swing the trade I would do it. You will really like the 63 better performance and vintage feel wise. I sense his plans will end up in a stalled resto d; /html/mgs/2004-11/msg00178.html (7,382 bytes)
4. Re: '63 vs. '68 (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:55:49 -0800 (PST); Boy, I would hate to see anything like this done to an early pull-handle car. I think there is cutting needed to do engine swaps on the early cars, which means that any change like this is essentiall; /html/mgs/2004-11/msg00180.html (7,676 bytes)
5. Re: '63 vs. '68 (score: 1): Author: hwmccullough@earthlink.net; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:57:15 -0800 (PST); Gang, I agree with Dan. After having done some research on a Camaro V6 conversion, the CBB would require irreversible cutting on the frame and firewall. That's why I decided against in on my '68. On; /html/mgs/2004-11/msg00181.html (7,029 bytes)
6. Re: '63 vs. '68 (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:46:10 -0800; Interesting quandary. Taking the engine and tranny as a unit would certainly work, with the usual futzing about with electrics and plumbing connections. Mixing and matching Mk. I and Mk. II engines a; /html/mgs/2004-11/msg00185.html (9,391 bytes)
7. Re: '63 vs. '68 (score: 1): Author: ksmith40@centurytel.net; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:23:27 -0600; Well, my preaching paid off (sort of). Todd told me today that last night he convinced his wife to learn to drive a standard (something I can't convince my wife). That means he's going to do the car; /html/mgs/2004-11/msg00188.html (7,352 bytes)
8. Re: '63 vs. '68 (score: 1): Author: Carl French <leylandauto@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:54:49 -0800 (PST); I would become good friends with the guy and circle the place like a vulture until he lets you go get it :-) Carl I do think that his car will be a dead project in a year, but I hope I'm wrong. And I; /html/mgs/2004-11/msg00189.html (7,247 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]