Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\'64\s+\+4\s+4\s+place\s+$I\s+think\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\'64\s+\+4\s+4\s+place\s+$I\s+think\?$\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. '64 +4 4 place (I think?) (score: 1): Author: john manning <jlm10@freewwweb.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:35:03 -0400; Got this Morgan about a month ago and just registered it on the Morganville web site. When I looked up my listing it had been changed from a +4 to a 4/4, I assume because of the #B1171 on the chassis; /html/morgans/2000-04/msg00004.html (7,975 bytes)
2. Re: '64 +4 4 place (I think?) (score: 1): Author: CHarris990@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:21:06 EDT; << #B1171 >> John, Your chassis is a 4/4 manufactured in 1966. Harris; /html/morgans/2000-04/msg00005.html (7,519 bytes)
3. SV: '64 +4 4 place (I think?) (score: 1): Author: Bjørn Schage <schage@online.no; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:15:15 +0200; Hi John. Yup, this seems like another Morgan mystery. To my knowledge, all four-seaters made in the 60's were +4's ( with a few known exeptions). So it appears that the only thing wrong with the comb; /html/morgans/2000-04/msg00008.html (8,229 bytes)
4. Re: '64 +4 4 place (I think?) (score: 1): Author: john manning <jlm10@freewwweb.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 14:03:55 -0400; Just spoke to someone who said that no 4/4's where made with the 4 place body. But mine is defiantly a 4 place. Can anyone clear this up? Also aren't the 4/4 and +4 chassises different dimensions? An; /html/morgans/2000-04/msg00017.html (7,975 bytes)
5. Re: '64 +4 4 place (I think?) (score: 1): Author: CHarris990@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:58:37 EDT; Your car may be a parts car. 4/4 4 seaters were made after your car's chassis was made. Your original engine number should be stamped on the center lip of your bonnet. Harris; /html/morgans/2000-04/msg00020.html (7,465 bytes)
6. Re: '64 +4 4 place (I think?) (score: 1): Author: Jim Walters <bristol@coastnet.com>; Date: Tue, 05 Apr 1994 13:26:32 +0000; Just to make things even more confusing, about 20 years ago I resprayed a 59 4/4 2 seater that obviously was a four seater at one time. One could easily tell by the remnants of the wood in the rear a; /html/morgans/2000-04/msg00022.html (7,829 bytes)
7. Re: '64 +4 4 place (I think?) (score: 1): Author: Bob Nogueira <nogera@prodigy.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:51:03 -0500; -- [ From: Bob Nogueira * EMC.Ver #3.1a ] -- John While the Chassis differs between the 4/4 and Plus four the difference is so minor that one could modify either to fit the other. If your instruments; /html/morgans/2000-04/msg00024.html (9,668 bytes)
8. Re: '64 +4 4 place (I think?) (score: 1): Author: HABCTRMD@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 22:25:19 EDT; Dear Jim, On behalf of all the Morgan owners and fans (I assume they share this sentiment) on this network let me wish you the best of luck on your upcoming Round the World Challenge...you give new m; /html/morgans/2000-04/msg00025.html (7,852 bytes)
9. Re: '64 +4 4 place (I think?) (score: 1): Author: "Hermen Pol" <polmognl@wxs.nl>; Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 11:41:01 +0200; Bob Nogueira more than probably is right. It sounds like your started life as a +4, but is currently is using a 4/4 Series V chassis. Is your car really a 4-seater? From 1955 (when the Series II 4/4; /html/morgans/2000-04/msg00099.html (7,993 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]