Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\'74\s+TR6\s+originality\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\'74\s+TR6\s+originality\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. '74 TR6 originality question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 16:06:57 -0400; My '74 TR6 (built in Dec 1973 according to the plate inside the LH door frame) has the big rubber over-riders on the bumpers. Various sources say this didn't start until 1975. Are the sources wrong,; /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg01103.html (7,283 bytes)
2. Re: '74 TR6 originality question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 17:10:45 -0400; Ted, your sources are incorrect. The big rubber bumpers began late 1973 or early 1974. My Commission number is CF199050U, and is cursed with those bumpers. Carol Zingone 1974 TR6 -- Sybill; /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg01108.html (7,853 bytes)
3. Re: '74 TR6 originality question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 18:13:05 -0400 (EDT); within 10 seconds of hitting SEND. *sigh*) Ted My '74 TR6 was built Jan 2nd, 1974. It has the rubber overiders just like yours. Your car is correct. My commission number is CF16990U. So I guess our c; /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg01115.html (8,190 bytes)
4. Re: '74 TR6 originality question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 08:55:06 -0400 (EDT); My Commission number is CF199050U, and is cursed with I've read this opinion on the black rubber bumper guards before. Were they added for looks, some US reulation or to maintain the chrome in a less; /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg01257.html (7,353 bytes)
5. Re: '74 TR6 originality question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 09:12:25 -0400; US (?) regulation. I believe it had some safety applications, but can't recall. I like the look and find the earlier I don't think the 74 rubber overriders can be easily removed. Personally, I really; /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg01260.html (8,461 bytes)
6. Re: '74 TR6 originality question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 09:12:25 -0400; US (?) regulation. I believe it had some safety applications, but can't recall. I like the look and find the earlier I don't think the 74 rubber overriders can be easily removed. Personally, I really; /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg01261.html (8,467 bytes)
7. Re: '74 TR6 originality question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 08:55:31 -0500 (EST); Starting that year, all cars sold in the U.S. were required to have impact-absorbing bumpers. Most also have shock absorbers built in, too. They aren't a bad idea, but the British companies did a ho; /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg01265.html (8,012 bytes)
8. Re: '74 TR6 originality question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 14:42:42 -0400; Just a further note. A lot of people think it's a "silly safety regulation" since rubber bumpers don't really help safety. However, it was actually more designed for insurance companies than safety.; /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg01283.html (8,117 bytes)
9. Re: '74 TR6 originality question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 15:22:27 +0600 (EDT); Trevor Boicey responded: The intent of the standard was to "prevent damage to the car body and safety-related equipment [such as lights] at barrier impact speeds of...." (Quote courtesy of NHSTA) The; /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg01296.html (9,194 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]