Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\?High\s+and\s+Mighty\?\:\s+On\s+or\s+Off\-Track\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\?High\s+and\s+Mighty\?\:\s+On\s+or\s+Off\-Track\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. RE: ?High and Mighty?: On or Off-Track? (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 12:45:28 -0600; It amazes me how much the press is fawning over Bradsher. Oh...that's right, he's one of them. Bradsher brings it all together for his readers, blending the environmentalist's hatred of SUVs because; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00433.html (8,668 bytes)
2. Re: ?High and Mighty?: On or Off-Track? (score: 1): Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:58:25 -0800 (PST); Chuck Renner SEZ - (Deletions...) This SUV hatred is truly bizarre. Just because a guy writes about cars for the New York Times doesn't mean he knows anything about cars. Most of these "lay press" ty; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00435.html (9,061 bytes)
3. Re: ?High and Mighty?: On or Off-Track? (score: 1): Author: Chad Cooper <mgb72@airmail.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:59:06 -0800; Another interesting thing is Lutz' supposed involvement, he has been on other projects for quite awhile, and in the middle of GM's performance division, like the Corvette, Camaro, Monaro/GTO (Camaro; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00441.html (8,313 bytes)
4. Re: ?High and Mighty?: On or Off-Track? (score: 1): Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:05:21 -0800 (PST); Chad Cooper SEZ - No more so than Henry Ford II was responsible for the "Edsel craze". Just because you design, build and hype the heck out of a vehicle, people won't buy it unless it's something the; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00442.html (8,756 bytes)
5. Re: ?High and Mighty?: On or Off-Track? (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 20:51:27 -0800; For "huge segment of the US population" read the "masses". There is an expression "There is no hope for the masses". Take sugar, fat, guns, and music for instance. The masses eat lots of sugar and fa; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00447.html (9,717 bytes)
6. Re: ?High and Mighty?: On or Off-Track? (score: 1): Author: N3KKE@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:43:28 EST; Not if you consider the track record of the Left. There's a lot more to it that you probably haven't noticed. Notice that they don't attack the trucking industry, which accounted for in excess of 5,0; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00459.html (8,454 bytes)
7. Re: ?High and Mighty?: On or Off-Track? (score: 1): Author: Bill Saidel <saidel@camden.rutgers.edu>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:54:19 -0500; (I hope this isn't duplicated. I forgot to delete the trailor, 1st time Ach, I don't like this Wendell and don't think what you said is well thought out or relevant to the mgs@autox.team.net list nor; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00477.html (10,843 bytes)
8. Re: ?High and Mighty?: On or Off-Track? (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:59:30 -0600; Chuck, you've obviously missed the point. The point is that the taller, more massive SUV does more damage to another vehicle when it runs into it than a car would. The damage claim for the other vehi; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00510.html (8,342 bytes)
9. Re: ?High and Mighty?: On or Off-Track? (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 09:54:07 -0000; Since SUVs perform much worse than conventional saloon cars in collision tests against objects like solid concrete blocks the sooner they start hitting each other the better. /// or try http://www.te; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00566.html (8,230 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]