Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Cam\s+Opinions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Cam\s+Opinions\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] cam opinions (score: 1): Author: Jim Jones <jimjcmo@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:23:09 -0800 (PST); I realize I'm opening a can of worms here, but I hope the discussions will be fairly civil. I'm having my head re-done (unleaded conversion, new guides, etc.) and will mill it to yield a 9.5:1 compre; /html/6pack/2007-11/msg00113.html (7,411 bytes)
2. RE: [6pack] cam opinions (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:13:57 -0800; Oh, goody! I LOVE the can of worms discussions! Threats exchanged, hate mail made public, half baked claims, MASS HYSTERIA. The kind of situation in which I can always contribute by stirring the pot; /html/6pack/2007-11/msg00115.html (10,427 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] cam opinions (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:14:59 -0800; Jim--The cams you have listed as options will give their best performances from mid range to redline and beyond. If you want low to mid range performance, stay with the late TR6 cam with the 256 dura; /html/6pack/2007-11/msg00116.html (8,010 bytes)
4. RE: [6pack] cam opinions (score: 1): Author: Jim Jones <jimjcmo@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:58:13 -0800 (PST); Hmmm. Vance you gave me little more than a "can" of worms. These worms are the size of Hindenberg! So far, no email flames or emails arguing the minutae of one cam versus the other. Actually, you to; /html/6pack/2007-11/msg00117.html (7,255 bytes)
5. RE: [6pack] cam opinions (score: 1): Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:14:59 -0500 (EST); There are some cams out there that are close to what Vance describes as optimal. I got a re-grind from a cam grinder in FL that is almost exactly what is referred to, e.g. an asymetrical 270--ish ca; /html/6pack/2007-11/msg00118.html (8,227 bytes)
6. RE: [6pack] cam opinions (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:59:43 -0800; Cam events are easy to calculate. Just a little algebra. LS = lobe spacing (cam degrees) ID = intake duration (crankshaft degrees) ED = exhaust duration (crankshaft degrees) ADV = Camshaft advance (; /html/6pack/2007-11/msg00123.html (10,509 bytes)
7. [6pack] Cam Opinions (score: 1): Author: Bruce Simms <brucesimms2003@yahoo.ca>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:22:56 -0800 (PST); I added a hotter cam when I rebuilt and shaved the head to 3.4", added SU HS6s, KNs, header, twin exhaust etc. I wanted the re-grinders 270/.398 profile TR6 cam, but he said he couldn't get there wit; /html/6pack/2007-11/msg00128.html (7,994 bytes)
8. RE: [6pack] Cam Opinions (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:14:21 -0800; As Yogi Berra observed "Its Deja Vu all over again". Remarkably similar to my story on my Z28. Here is a cam that is very close to what I want, but it is JUST A LITTLE more aggressive. What can it h; /html/6pack/2007-11/msg00129.html (9,500 bytes)
9. Re: [6pack] Cam Opinions (score: 1): Author: Bruce Simms <brucesimms2003@yahoo.ca>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:41:37 -0800 (PST); Bruce Bruce: As Yogi Berra observed "Its Deja Vu all over again". Remarkably similar to my story on my Z28. Here is a cam that is very close to what I want, but it is JUST A LITTLE more aggressive. W; /html/6pack/2007-11/msg00131.html (10,335 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]