Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Interior\s+Sound\s+Insulation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Interior\s+Sound\s+Insulation\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] Interior Sound Insulation (score: 1): Author: Corey Sherman <cm.sherman@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:32:11 -0500 (CDT); What is the list's opinion on sound and heat insulation products: Dynamat (xtreme or original) vs FatMat or others. Working on restoring the old TR6 and looking to upgrade the original paddings below; /html/6pack/2008-06/msg00107.html (6,960 bytes)
2. Re: [6pack] Interior Sound Insulation (score: 1): Author: "Ronald Olds" <tr6@pipeline.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:48:32 -0400; I used the cheap JC Whitney product on my car I place of the original. This stuff had foil on one side and was a little thicker than the original. I was very impressed with the difference it made. I; /html/6pack/2008-06/msg00109.html (7,523 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] Interior Sound Insulation (score: 1): Author: lfm614@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:10:27 +0000; I used dynamat. It has a peel and stick adhesive side with foil backing. Works great, while not as heavy as the cheaper stuff I got samples on but provides good heat / sound insulation. Got mine thro; /html/6pack/2008-06/msg00110.html (9,384 bytes)
4. Re: [6pack] Interior Sound Insulation (score: 1): Author: "Bob Danielson" <75TR6@tr6.danielsonfamily.org>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:29:46 -0400; Corey....I don't know that there is a good answer to that question. Dynamat is the best know and, maybe, the most expensive product out there. Keep in mind that most of these products were designed f; /html/6pack/2008-06/msg00111.html (9,290 bytes)
5. Re: [6pack] Interior Sound Insulation (score: 1): Author: "Joseph Grant" <grant@bowtie6.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:52:58 -0400; I used Dynamat Extreme exclusively when I built my car. The stuff works. There is a marked difference in the way the body panels 'feel' and sound by applying this material. I ended up using two bulk; /html/6pack/2008-06/msg00114.html (7,872 bytes)
6. Re: [6pack] Interior Sound Insulation (score: 1): Author: <forzion@maine.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:33:32 -0400; Check out http://www.sounddeadenershowdown.com/conclusion/ I used Second Skin's Damplifier (http://www.secondskinaudio.com). It was rated as best by the testing methods used on the website above. Ad; /html/6pack/2008-06/msg00116.html (8,923 bytes)
7. Re: [6pack] Interior Sound Insulation (score: 1): Author: "Bob Danielson" <75TR6@tr6.danielsonfamily.org>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:05:36 -0400; My guess is any butyl based sound deadening material works, some better then others and price may or may not be a factor in how good a job it does. What it really comes down to is............how goo; /html/6pack/2008-06/msg00122.html (10,841 bytes)
8. Re: [6pack] Interior Sound Insulation (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Packard" <apackard68@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:48:00 -0700; I just bought Damplifier from second skin. One box for about a $100 looks like it will cover enough area for me. I haven't installed it yet, but it had the best reviews for performance I could find.; /html/6pack/2008-06/msg00126.html (8,523 bytes)
9. Re: [6pack] Interior Sound Insulation (score: 1): Author: "Marty Clark" <marty.tr6@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:46:56 -0700; I used Damplifer Pro and could not be happier. I had someone who has driven a lot of different Triumphs drive my TR6 he could not believe how solid the car sounded and felt. As a side benefit the hea; /html/6pack/2008-06/msg00165.html (8,741 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]