Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+TR6\s+stopping\s+distance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+TR6\s+stopping\s+distance\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: Greg Perry <rgperry@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:20:00 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Hello List, What is the stock TR6 stopping distance from 60 mph or equivalent standard measure? Thanks, Greg Perry; /html/6pack/2007-04/msg00025.html (6,436 bytes)
2. Re: [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: Vsnively@aol.com; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:30:46 EDT; Hello List, What is the stock TR6 stopping distance from 60 mph or equivalent standard measure? Thanks, Greg Perry Your messages not reaching the list? Check out http://www.team.net/posting.html == H; /html/6pack/2007-04/msg00028.html (7,043 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: "John Macartney" <standardtriumph@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:32:38 +0100; Sorry Ed - but it's far more complex than that. In the first instance, I'd draw your attention to www.highwaycode.gov.uk/09.htm#105 where you'll see *typical* braking distances. These figures (or bet; /html/6pack/2007-05/msg00001.html (8,762 bytes)
4. Re: [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: Ed Bratt <bratt@sasktel.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:48:32 -0600; I think TR6 stopping distances are a well kept secret. I do not rememer seeing a stopping distance given, ever. The Brits do not give stopping much attention. They seem to sum things up as being "ad; /html/6pack/2007-04/msg00032.html (7,305 bytes)
5. Re: [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: Ed Bratt <bratt@sasktel.net>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 10:52:08 -0600; The reason I commented about the Brits not giving stopping distances is that I have read numerous articles including road tests that did not give any measurement of stopping distances. One test I re; /html/6pack/2007-05/msg00003.html (8,557 bytes)
6. Re: [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: Ed Bratt <bratt@sasktel.net>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 10:58:48 -0600; What model year is your original pamphlet for? Is the weight given? Overdrive, or non-OD? Ed Bratt Regina, Saskatchewan 1976 TR6 -- Original Message -- From: shewfamily@aol.com To: standardtriumph@b; /html/6pack/2007-05/msg00004.html (7,882 bytes)
7. RE: [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: "Foster, Stan" <stan.foster@hp.com>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:06:22 +0000; Despite servo assistance, the brakes are heavy too [this was after a clutch description], calling for over 100lbs of effort for an emergency stop. Mostly though they react with a reassuring bite, pul; /html/6pack/2007-05/msg00005.html (7,680 bytes)
8. Re: [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: Btp44@aol.com; Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:09:53 EDT; Greg-I found a R&T road test (1973) that shows the 60 to 0 stopping distance as 155 ft. and the 80 to 0 dist.as 280 ft. An earlier C&D test (Feb. 1969) gives the 80 to 0 dist. as 237 ft. Berry Price; /html/6pack/2007-05/msg00006.html (6,989 bytes)
9. Re: [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:57:16 -0400 (EDT); [stuff deleted] There are two bolt-in varieties of replacement wheel cylinders that folks are using right now. The Sunbeam Alpine rear wheel cyl can be obtained from Victoria British. I forget the co; /html/6pack/2007-05/msg00007.html (8,005 bytes)
10. Re: [6pack] TR6 stopping distance (score: 1): Author: "John Macartney" <standardtriumph@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:14:40 +0100; I have now been able to obtain from definitive data on TR6 emergency stopping distances. The car in question is a UK spec TR6PI with overdrive and wire wheels but the actual weight of the test car wa; /html/6pack/2007-05/msg00022.html (7,703 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]