Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Baby\s+\'cuda\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Baby\s+\'cuda\]\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Baby 'cuda] (score: 1): Author: Jan Eyerman <jan.eyerman@usa.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:26:13 -0400; True, but the Rapier hardtop was essentially a Hillman Minx convertible with a roof welded on (the Rapier Convert was almost identical to the Minx convertible). Most body components will interchange; /html/alpines/2003-09/msg00078.html (9,695 bytes)
2. Re: [Baby 'cuda] (score: 1): Author: RootesRooter@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:32:32 EDT; << True, but the Rapier hardtop was essentially a Hillman Minx convertible with a roof welded on (the Rapier Convert was almost identical to the Minx convertible). Most body components will interchan; /html/alpines/2003-09/msg00079.html (7,329 bytes)
3. Re: [Baby 'cuda] (score: 1): Author: Keith Johnson <keiths55@bigpond.net.au>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:13:33 +1000; NO NO NO You have it all wrong. :-) The Rapier came first. The Minx is almost identical to the Rapier, just two extra doors. Series I Rapier released 1956. Series I Minx released 1957. Keith 55 Calif; /html/alpines/2003-09/msg00080.html (8,014 bytes)
4. SV: [Baby 'cuda] (score: 1): Author: kkj <kkj@privat.utfors.se>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:48:24 +0200; Yes, and I know this very well. My parents did buy the S1 Rapier when it came out because there where no Minx then. (except the old Mk model). Otherwise they should probably taken the Minx. Kristian; /html/alpines/2003-09/msg00081.html (8,865 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]