Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[F500\]\s+Re\:\s+USGP\s+Michelin\s+FIA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[F500\]\s+Re\:\s+USGP\s+Michelin\s+FIA\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [F500] Re: USGP Michelin FIA (score: 1): Author: Dave Riddle <dave@microworks.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:53:09 -0700; Except if you get distracted looking in one direction you may run out of time in finding the contributing problem. Sitting here looking at my "Minardi F1 Team" ballcap I think it would have been the; /html/fot/2005-06/msg00349.html (7,884 bytes)
2. Re: [F500] Re: USGP Michelin FIA (score: 1): Author: Dave Riddle <dave@microworks.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:40:22 -0700; Absolutely, the objective "should" be how to accommodate the fans and the sponsors! However, the issue still boiled down to either a Chicane was put in at T13 or Michelin would tell it's teams not t; /html/fot/2005-06/msg00350.html (8,356 bytes)
3. RE: [F500] Re: USGP Michelin FIA (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:16:34 -0700; Personally, I think it is ludicrous to even consider that Ferrari be blamed for the problems that occurred at Indy. Their tires were up to the task at the USGP while Michelin's were not. Think back t; /html/fot/2005-06/msg00351.html (9,668 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]