Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+DCOE\s+Weber\s+linkage\s+size\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+DCOE\s+Weber\s+linkage\s+size\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [FOT] DCOE Weber linkage size question (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Arnold" <triosan@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:29:12 -0700; does anyone know the thread diameter and pitch of the linkage arms used on the Cannon thrple DCOE setup -- I need to get shorter arms as the front one is too tall to fit under the hood on the TR250.; /html/fot/2006-07/msg00194.html (6,921 bytes)
2. Re: [FOT] DCOE Weber linkage size question (score: 1): Author: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:38:23 -0400; We'll have to get the terminology correct first. If you mean the connecting fod between the linkage arm and the throttle shaft arm, then it is 5mm x 0.8mm. Remember, it is a LH thread on one end, an; /html/fot/2006-07/msg00212.html (7,338 bytes)
3. RE: [FOT] DCOE Weber linkage size question (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:34:26 -0700; And here I always thought FOD was a bad thing ... Randall; /html/fot/2006-07/msg00214.html (6,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]