Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+Data\s+acquisition\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:19:14 -0700
I just bought one of the G2X Data Acquisition systems. I was so impressed with the one I borrowed that i had to have one. Complex little buggers, but you can put them into anything with no need for s
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00264.html (6,780 bytes)

2. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 03:44:43 GMT
Earlier this year I bought a system from Inovate (the LM1 plus LM3). This does not have GPS, but does have high resolution oxygen sensor. It also has accelerometers, rpm and connections for other sen
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00265.html (9,168 bytes)

3. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:24:23 -0700
A little more about this--you can map a track by driving around the inside and outside edges. the GPS locates you with great accuracy. It will even do three dimensions if you have more than three sat
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00266.html (10,149 bytes)

4. RE: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: "Henry Frye" <henry@henryfrye.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:24:20 -0400
As the prices of these things have been falling to levels that almost make the decision to buy a no-brainer, I had to ask myself... How far from the Vintage Spirit can we get? How ridiculous would th
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00267.html (8,553 bytes)

5. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: William G Rosenbach <wgrosenbach@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:23:09 -0600
If 'Vintage Racing' were actually trying to replicate the real racing of 'back-in-the-day', Timing & Scoring would be a bunch of folks with analog stop watches, paper & pencil. The ones & zeros crowd
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00268.html (9,497 bytes)

6. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Labs0808@aol.com
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:29:41 EDT
We have been running a system in a friends of mine Devin SS for the last year he is a rookie driver and for as much crap that I gave him when we first installed it I believe it has helped teach and m
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00269.html (8,225 bytes)

7. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:36:53 -0700
That was one of the considerations of this system--it's portable, no need to leave it in. Besides, other people's cows are their problem.
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00270.html (9,468 bytes)

8. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
I'll be very interested to know how this works out in reality. Autonomous GPS accuracy is about 15' - you can't do a lot better than that with a single receiver. That's almost the width of the racin
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00271.html (8,706 bytes)

9. RE: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Munson" <fasttrs@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:50:42 -0400
Hey Henry, Just get one with a display on the inside of your helmet shield and you wouldn't have to worry about that! :-) Mike
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00273.html (8,393 bytes)

10. RE: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:36:59 -0700
Actually it works amazingly well, though I can't tell you why. I had my doubts as well, but the system appears to be accurate within a foot or so. I didn't do anything scientific to test this, just l
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00275.html (9,910 bytes)

11. RE: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
Now that I think about it some more, this is pretty believable, if done in a relatively short timeframe. The absolute accuracy won't be good from weekend to weekend, but over the course of an hour,
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00276.html (8,984 bytes)

12. RE: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:54:53 -0700
My conclusion as well--I think the accuracy issue has to do with absolute location, not relative. Still, there's more going on here since the track maps can be shared and you can use one you made ove
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00277.html (10,192 bytes)

13. RE: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:22:09 -0700
WAAS is up and working, has been for quite some time (although there are still more improvements and satellites to come). We have demonstrated long-term accuracy using WAAS to less than a foot (1 si
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00280.html (11,024 bytes)

14. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: DSPGTi@aol.com
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:29:49 EDT
I should have known. I should have seen it coming. I'm surrounded every day with technology. You would think that in the auto salvage business (they use to call it a junk yard) that I would be remove
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00285.html (9,469 bytes)

15. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:14:18 -0700
Still is seat of the pants, and I build most of my own stuff, with my own hands. Perhaps even more so than most, though so do pretty much all the guys on this list as far as I know. If I can use a li
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00286.html (10,587 bytes)

16. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: BillDentin@aol.com
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:38:55 EDT
I'll SECOND the latter (not the former). Bill (Damdinger) PS Dave...you should try and respond to emails and other correspondence earlier in the day.
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00293.html (8,872 bytes)

17. RE: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:53:27 -0400
You can do better than 1" with non-differential. In the NSF-funded continent-wide EarthScope Project (www.earthscope.org), we map crustal motions with sub-cm accuracy. We use dual-frequency receivers
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00294.html (9,321 bytes)

18. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Guyots3@wmconnect.com
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:52:15 EDT
How sad that one person cannot have the good grace to let another just enjoy his old race car in any way he desires. Quite exactly what it has to do with 'him' how you choose to do so, is quite beyin
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00297.html (8,863 bytes)

19. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: DSPGTi@aol.com
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:37:16 EDT
Sorry for the rant. I had a bad day yesterday and I guess I was looking for a fight (figurative).
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00298.html (8,307 bytes)

20. Re: [FOT] Data acquisition (score: 1)
Author: Dave Riddle <dave@microworks.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:34:55 -0700
The funny thing about Data Acq in use by non-pro teams/drivers is that it seems to be something they got because others have it. I run an old AIM Mychron system on my ancient Formula 500 car and we h
/html/fot/2006-07/msg00299.html (10,831 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu