- 1. [FOT] Forwarded message regarding oil (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark J. Bradakis" <mjb@autox.team.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:41:32 -0700 (MST)
- I'm still having a few difficulties with some of the upgraded/changed software on the server. Here's a message that didn't quite make it through, though I've seen it on some other Team.Net email list
- /html/fot/2006-12/msg00077.html (19,166 bytes)
- 2. Re: [FOT] Forwarded message regarding oil (score: 1)
- Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:29:02 -0600
- My understanding from my favorite oil industry executive is that "all" major brands are formulated to meet the newest API standard which is SM. That is the standard that took all those goodies out of
- /html/fot/2006-12/msg00078.html (9,373 bytes)
- 3. Re: [FOT] Forwarded message regarding oil (score: 1)
- Author: "Kas Kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:26:07 -0800
- I too can vouch for the Kendall oil. I used their diesel oil in my turbo engines and highly recommend it for anything that is racy. Never Be beaten by Equipment Kas Kastner -- Original Message -- Fro
- /html/fot/2006-12/msg00080.html (9,691 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu