Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+Motor\s+Mount\s+\-\s+Followup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+Motor\s+Mount\s+\-\s+Followup\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [FOT] Motor Mount - Followup (score: 1): Author: "Gary" <vintage.racer@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 17:15:20 -0800; Thanks for the feedback on the motor mounts. Second question: are the standard TR4 (round) or TR4A (rectangular) motor mounts preferred? Thanks. Gary '62 TR4; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00021.html (6,696 bytes)
2. Re: [FOT] Motor Mount - Followup (score: 1): Author: <triumph_marx@freenet.de>; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:22:20 +0100; I use rectangular mounts and I filled the chambers in the rubber blocks with window glue to make them more stiff. Additionaly I added a strut from the head to the fender to have less load on the moto; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00026.html (7,028 bytes)
3. Re: [FOT] Motor Mount - Followup (score: 1): Author: Steven Benford Jr <sbracing@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 05:39:32 -0800 (PST); Wasn't there a some sort of strut offered by the TR Comp department? triumph_marx@freenet.de wrote: I use rectangular mounts and I filled the chambers in the rubber blocks with window glue to make th; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00030.html (7,316 bytes)
4. Re: [FOT] Motor Mount - Followup (score: 1): Author: "J.C. Hassall" <jhassall@blacksburg.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 09:24:12 -0500; Not sure about the Comp dept., but many 4 pot TR engines are missing the torque reaction arm (Moss part number 031-651) and buffer. I think Joe Alexander makes 'em (much better quality than the offsh; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00033.html (8,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]