Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+New\s+Frame\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+New\s+Frame\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [FOT] New Frame (score: 1): Author: "Gary" <vintage.racer@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:29:49 -0800; I am considering replacing my forty-four year old, 1962 TR4 frame with a new one from RATCO. Since I race the car exclusively, I posed a question to Tony at RATCO regarding the possibility of using; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00100.html (7,349 bytes)
2. Re: [FOT] New Frame (score: 1): Author: EDWARD BARNARD <edwardbarnard@prodigy.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:20:23 -0800 (PST); I don't imagine you'll have a problem with the solid axle 4A frame, but, how does your race organization fel about a '62 TR4 showing up with IRS? These are the cases that Joe A and Tony addressed on; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00101.html (7,878 bytes)
3. Re: [FOT] New Frame (score: 1): Author: "CHARLES DELAUER" <budscars@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:57:56 +0000; Hi Gary..Don't do it!! stay with the straight frame..the IRS frame is a whole different animal..IF you find that your frame needs some repair, talk to Carl Stirtz.... Racer Bud; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00102.html (8,820 bytes)
4. Re: [FOT] New Frame (score: 1): Author: JWoesvra@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:05:50 EST; I can't imagine any open minded organization would object. This would have been perfectly legal under the "update/backdate" provision in the SCCA and FIA regulations. The car would just become the ne; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00103.html (7,458 bytes)
5. Re: [FOT] New Frame (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:41:26 EST; Gary, I prefer the idea of the TR4A Frame with the Solid Axle. It has been done before, usually as a matter of expediency/availabilty. I see the engineering of the later frame as a benefit to the fro; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00104.html (8,071 bytes)
6. Re: [FOT] New Frame (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <billb@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:49:55 -1000; It would be very interesting to have a frame built that incorporated the typical special-builder's modifications without the leftover stuff--especially for building an Ambro. Most specifically, movin; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00105.html (8,989 bytes)
7. Re: [FOT] New Frame (score: 1): Author: "Bill DeWar" <pcdelux@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:49:14 -0500; Hello all, Switching from an early TR4 chassis to a solid axle TR4-A style can be done. It involves more changes than just the frame. On a stock version the radiator, radiator braces, steering rack,; /html/fot/2006-11/msg00108.html (8,601 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]