Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+Ring\s+and\s+Pinion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+Ring\s+and\s+Pinion\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [FOT] Ring and Pinion (score: 1): Author: Todd Redmond <alfetta95@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:51:29 -0400; I have to replace the ring and pinion. What ratio is everyone using? With the tracks I run on in the Northeast, I'm inclined to go with a shorter ratio. Still, always looking for other opinions. Reg; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00173.html (6,621 bytes)
2. Re: [FOT] Ring and Pinion (score: 1): Author: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:46:25 -0700; When it comes to rings and pinions all opinions have the ring of truth. Ugh. Can't believe I did that. Pretty much depends on the weight of your car and the revs you're willing to use. I like the 3.9; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00178.html (7,425 bytes)
3. Re: [FOT] Ring and Pinion (score: 1): Author: <triumph_marx@freenet.de>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:05:41 +0200; I started with 3.7 and now I have a 4.1:1 ratio which fits perfect on all tracks but the Nordschleife needs a 4th+OD to be fine equipped. My car is very heavy with 965 kg and a short rear is better o; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00193.html (8,383 bytes)
4. [Fot] Ring and Pinion (score: 1): Author: Bob <rdavis4@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:00:20 -0400; All, Searching for a good used or new 3.45 ring and pinion. Prefer from a Triumph 2000 or 2500. thxx, Bob _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com; /html/fot/2014-08/msg00065.html (7,444 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]