Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+Thanks\s+for\s+advice\s+on\s+1\.5\s+\/\s+1\.625\s+head\s+ports\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+Thanks\s+for\s+advice\s+on\s+1\.5\s+\/\s+1\.625\s+head\s+ports\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [FOT] Thanks for advice on 1.5 / 1.625 head ports (score: 1): Author: "Tim Murphy" <timmurph@fastbytes.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 10:22:25 -0500; Thanks to all who replied to my 1.5 versus 1.625 intake port question. Even though we have the long intake manifold it has been opened up to 1.625 in the last 3/4 to 1 inch. The consensus seemed to b; /html/fot/2006-07/msg00081.html (8,078 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]