- 1. [Fot] 6 cylinder DCOE 40 setup (score: 1)
- Author: tom strange <tstrange@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
- Wow, what a strange reason to ditch Webers. Adjustability is about the only really good reason to buy Webers, other than the fact that they look bitchin'. ____________________________________________
- /html/fot/2009-09/msg00196.html (10,213 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Fot] 6 cylinder DCOE 40 setup (score: 1)
- Author: trbilbo@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:54:40 -0400
- I was going to "say" the same thing! You can make Webers do just about anything. And I have a $1500 collection of brass to prove it. I'd buy the setup for myself, but I'm trying to start thinning my
- /html/fot/2009-09/msg00197.html (8,022 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Fot] 6 cylinder DCOE 40 setup (score: 1)
- Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:03:45 +0200
- Pehaps the buyer did not understand just putting on the Webers was a waste of time--there is the cam, head porting and decent header-exhaust needed to use all that gas vapor. collection -- Chuck Arno
- /html/fot/2009-09/msg00198.html (11,858 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Fot] 6 cylinder DCOE 40 setup (score: 1)
- Author: "Spitfire Racing" <Spitfire_Racing@twcny.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:55:11 -0400
- Yes, Webers are great for tuning to the needs of a particular circuit but not so great on a street car that is traveling in multiple environments. That is why I got rid of my Spitfire twin DCOE setup
- /html/fot/2009-09/msg00199.html (7,138 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Fot] 6 cylinder DCOE 40 setup (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Babcock <billb@bnj.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:15:11 -0700
- I am contemplating a trip to California from Iowa sometime in the next three months. If I configure my rig right, I might be able to transport a car both ways. Anyone with a need to move stuff? Encl
- /html/fot/2009-09/msg00200.html (8,824 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu