Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Alloy\s+v\s+steel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Alloy\s+v\s+steel\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: Jim Cun <jimcun2001@yahoo.com.au>; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:01:44 -0800 (PST); Hi Guys, Just wanted to ask your thoughts on an alloy flywheel vs steel for a TR race car? Regards Jim Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now. http://au.yahoo.com/wor; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00231.html (7,771 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:14:37 -0600; Alloy flywheels seem harder to keep attached to the crankshaft. With proper care, they work well, though. They seem to be more troublesome in the 6 cylinder motors, anecdotally. - Tony ______________; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00232.html (8,590 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:57:34 -0500; I like my steel flywheel....trouble free and like a piece of jewelry that I hated to cover up. Joe _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html Fot mailing list Fot; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00233.html (9,207 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: Jim Cun <jimcun2001@yahoo.com.au>; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:13:11 -0800 (PST); We have a couple of guys "engine builders" here in OZ who say that using an alloy flywheel makes it difficult to get off the line. I would not even consider a steel flywheel unless it has the same s; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00234.html (8,925 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:24:12 EST; My steel flywheel is 10lbs, has no steel insert, and has always stayed on the crankshaft. The secret of the weight is in the machining. Joe A </HTML> _______________________________________________; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00235.html (7,978 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: "Marx Christian tr4-racing" <chris@tr4-racing.de>; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:15:50 +0100; My flywheel is 3,95 kg of weight without ringgear. So far a trouble free unit. Cheers Chris Hi Guys, Just wanted to ask your thoughts on an alloy flywheel vs steel for a TR race car? Regards Jim Make; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00236.html (8,432 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: "Marx Christian tr4-racing" <chris@tr4-racing.de>; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:04:22 +0100; Sorry I've forgotten......it is a steel wheel. _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html Fot mailing list Fot@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listin; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00237.html (9,731 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: "Kas Kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:26:09 -0800; It is sometimes confusing when referring to other than alloy flywheels, some are steel and others are CAST IRON. With a steel wheel I can see getting the weight out of the outside diameter and the to; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00238.html (10,407 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: fpspitfire@insightbb.com; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:11:21 -0500; I prefer the steel flywheels over modified cast iron and aluminium flywheels. I use a steel flywheel and it weighs about 6 lbs. aaron _______________________________________________ http://www.team.n; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00242.html (9,719 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: "Greg \"Lunker\" Hilyer" <lunkercars@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:34:23 -0700; Please elaborate a bit Kas. I've never heard of a steel flywheel for a TR. I always assumed they were all cast iron as OEM. Were there some that were steel from the factory? Or were the steel ones so; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00243.html (12,050 bytes)
11. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:34:55 -0800; Greg, check out this link below. It seems the consensus is steel vs. aluminum. This was my thought also and I now have 2 steel flywheels for the long ended crankshaft. I'm having one of them machined; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00245.html (13,613 bytes)
12. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:29:42 -0500; STEEL! YES! These have and can be made in the u.s. If there is an order interest of 10 we could revisit the quote & leadtime. I want another one myself. Joe A ________________________________________; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00247.html (8,171 bytes)
13. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: "BOB KRAMER" <rkramer3@austin.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:31:46 -0600; BPNW stocks a TR4 and TR6 lightweight steel flywheel. They have conflicting info, the blurb says 9.5 lbs. but the link on the order page says 11 lbs. Either way, it's steel and of the same design as; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00249.html (10,032 bytes)
14. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:44:54 -0800; I'm not a fan of alloy flywheels, I've had two come adrift despite a lot of modification and prep. The steel flywheels are almost as light and seem bulletproof. The cast ones can't be lightened enoug; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00267.html (9,306 bytes)
15. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:45:59 -0800; We have been using aluminum alloy flywheels on the TR-4 engines for over 25 years. Then engines we have put them on have ranged from 115 hp to 190 hp. We have had one (1) problem in that time. I t wa; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00276.html (11,347 bytes)
16. Re: [Fot] Alloy v steel (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:47:32 -0800; Sorry, I understand that the 6 cylinder engine is a "different kettle of fish" and is much harder to keep the flywheel on at high rpm. Greg Solow _______________________________________________ http:; /html/fot/2007-11/msg00277.html (10,485 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]