Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Con\s+Rod\s+Bearing\s+clearance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Con\s+Rod\s+Bearing\s+clearance\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Con Rod Bearing clearance (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:13:50 -0500; The standard of .003" clearance was esspecially for stock rods which do not stay as round as a Carrillo rod will. Just the same I would like to see .002 to .0025" as a minimum figure. We have run en; /html/fot/2009-08/msg00019.html (6,956 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Con Rod Bearing clearance (score: 1): Author: "Terry and Cindy" <roadandtrack@bigpond.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:21:25 +1000; I recently assembled a GT-6 engine, and checked the clearances several ways. It is time consuming, and requires the use of micrometers, etc. If you do not have these, find someone who does or invest; /html/fot/2009-08/msg00020.html (6,729 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Con Rod Bearing clearance (score: 1): Author: Ernest Husmann <ehusmann53@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:14:24 -0700 (PDT); An on line car magazine has finished an article on my TR6 racecar. The link http://www.retromod-mag.com/hot-6/ I could have not finished this 1970 TR6 racecar project without the help and guidance of; /html/fot/2009-08/msg00021.html (7,824 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]