Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Faulty\s+Water\s+Temp\s+Gauge\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Faulty\s+Water\s+Temp\s+Gauge\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: Mike Munson <fasttrs@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:53:20 -0500; I'd pull the sensor and put it in some hot or boiling water while hooked to your gauge and see what it reads. _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00053.html (10,537 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:55:58 -0500; Well, that's your first mistake, IMO. For racing, I would definitely replace that thing with a 270 sweep mechanical unit. If this is the stock TR6 gauge, I would suspect the voltage stabilizer; whic; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00054.html (9,397 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:53:38 +0200; Harbor Freight has their infra red temp sensor on sale at 29.95. it has a slug of uses including verifying temp gauge accuracy. _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00055.html (10,849 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: vintage.racer@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:29:52 +0000 (UTC); But be careful what you try to shoot with it. I have one, and while it works well enough on the radiator tanks, it gives readings that are all over the place from the thermostat housing or radiator; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00056.html (7,980 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: <rdavis4@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 19:02:08 +0000; Infrared gauges are precise on colored surfaces like a black coated radiator or rubber hoses. If you try to measure polished metal surfaces you will get much lower readings which has something to do; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00057.html (9,091 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 12:06:42 -0700; How are they on tires? _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00058.html (7,609 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: "riverside" <riverside@southslope.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:01:41 -0500; I use them on tires very successful. But if you measure your tire temperature after you ve driven through the paddock a probe type sensor which you push into the surface for a few millimeters is bett; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00059.html (8,442 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:21:36 -0700; mine gets erratic when near ignition system components. _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: h; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00060.html (8,362 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:31:35 +0200; Definitely verify the actual temperature. I have seen many new sending units for MGB and TR6 that read high. Bill DeWar NJTA -- Original Message -- From: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com> To: "'Fr; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00061.html (9,662 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: robert bownes <bownes@seiri.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 17:38:14 -0400; I wouldn't use an infrared gauge on tires if you are trying to get three points on the tire. You really need a probe. jim g How are they on tires? _______________________________________________ fot@; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00062.html (10,791 bytes)
11. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:42:13 +0200; the though of narrower rods at the big end region worries me. I run an engine shop, and know from bitter experience, that excessive side clearance at the big end, is a major source of engine rattles; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00063.html (10,881 bytes)
12. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: toodamnfunky@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:46:11 +0000 (UTC); As I recall, the voltage stabilizer also supplies the voltage for the fuel gauge in the stock setup, at least on the TR4-A. So if it's the voltage stabilizer you would also have erratic readings on t; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00066.html (11,814 bytes)
13. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: "Enquiries Road & Track" <enquiries@roadandtrack.net.au>; Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:57:45 +1000; my voltage stabilizer was missing and read high, of course. installed it and the tr4 showed normal operating temps. In my case with a TR4A, the fuel gauge also was reading incorrectly. A new voltage; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00067.html (8,039 bytes)
14. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: Dennis DeLap <yellow-green@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:12:23 -0700 (PDT); _______________________________________________ http://www.fot-racing.com Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00068.html (8,796 bytes)
15. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: "Tim Murphy" <timmurph@fastbytes.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:13:49 -0500; There are similar rods for the TR6 from Opel F3 cars. They are titanium made and have narrow big ends. --Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-- Von: fot-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:fot-bounces@autox.team.net]; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00070.html (9,893 bytes)
16. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:57:14 +0200; We expect to continue to run the Chevy Rods. It just seems to work well. But combine this with the Larry Young cam and it is even better. The engine comes on strong earlier in the revs and we shift 5; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00074.html (11,087 bytes)
17. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: Glenn Franco <gaf3@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:29:12 -0400; definetely go mechanical.. _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Fo; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00077.html (10,772 bytes)
18. Re: [Fot] Faulty Water Temp Gauge? (score: 1): Author: n197tr4@cs.com; Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:30:08 -0400; Wow...the vintage rules must be more liberal than ever if they are now allowing alternate length rods. SCCA hasB limited prep which require stock rods and cranks, stock suspension pickup points, etc.; /html/fot/2010-07/msg00078.html (9,216 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]