- 1. [Fot] Fwd: 75 TR6 turn signals (score: 1)
- Author: Gt6steve@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 15:50:05 EST
- SU's have a sort of "sealed" or "finished" quality to their surface.? Any type of blasting will destroy that original "patina".? If you are rebuilding the carbs for show or originality, that surface
- /html/fot/2009-01/msg00005.html (7,537 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Fot] Fwd: 75 TR6 turn signals (score: 1)
- Author: EDWARD BARNARD <edwardbarnard@prodigy.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:14:48 -0800 (PST)
- Dear Lister's, I am seeking those people who have had experience with 45mm WEBER DCOE's fitted to TR3/4 engines. Specifically those that have modified the progression circuit holes to remove problems
- /html/fot/2009-01/msg00007.html (9,266 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Fot] Fwd: 75 TR6 turn signals (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Babcock <Billb@bnj.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:03:11 -1000
- Before I was old enough to drive, I figured out that the right combination of switches in Dad's Dodge would allow the radio to play without the key. But you had to turn off the heater and wipers, ot
- /html/fot/2009-01/msg00012.html (9,119 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Fot] Fwd: 75 TR6 turn signals (score: 1)
- Author: Susan Kahler <susank@141.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:10:11 -0500
- Plus the ground inside the holder may be open, even without being corroded. On mine, there was a gap of perhaps 1/16" between the two conductors inside the holder. Here's a tech article showing the
- /html/fot/2009-01/msg00013.html (8,720 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu