- 1. [Fot] IRS TR rear hubs & axles (score: 1)
- Author: "riverside" <riverside@southslope.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:41:05 -0500
- After this mornings discussion I got playing around and made a jig for converting our rear seals to a better and cheaper seal. I was able to convert four of them, all I had, available for thirty Doll
- /html/fot/2010-08/msg00093.html (7,207 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Fot] IRS TR rear hubs & axles (score: 1)
- Author: "macdonaldp" <macdonaldp@rogers.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:39:25 -0400
- Well it's gonna still be the same threads. If you get ham handed then it's helicoil time. A most imperfect solution in my opinion. I stud mine to postpone that aggravation but it only buys time. They
- /html/fot/2010-08/msg00095.html (7,702 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Fot] IRS TR rear hubs & axles (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Munson <fasttrs@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
- My thoughts exactly. Joe(B) This issue of head gasket thickness has puzzled me for some time. I understand why this was such a big issue in the old days, because people used off the shelf pistons. Ho
- /html/fot/2010-08/msg00098.html (8,792 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Fot] IRS TR rear hubs & axles (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:40:27 -0500
- Sure custom pistons can be ordered to whatever specs you want, but if you want to run what you've got, perhaps this HG is a little too thick to get the desired CR. ~Steve This issue of head gasket th
- /html/fot/2010-08/msg00100.html (9,139 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Fot] IRS TR rear hubs & axles (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:40:56 GMT
- Bob, we appreciate your kind words. Yes, this has been a long hard job and we are now trying to develop a few alternatives that will hopefully prevent us from going in the hole. Disappointed? Very. W
- /html/fot/2010-08/msg00102.html (9,097 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu