Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+New\s+Triumph\s+by\s+BMW\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+New\s+Triumph\s+by\s+BMW\s+\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: Don Elliott <58tr3a@videotron.ca>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:37:05 -0400; http://netcars.co.uk/articles/Triumph-210892-2.aspx Is this for real ? _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html Fot mailing list Fot@autox.team.net http://autox; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00164.html (7,714 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: "spitfiresuz@141.com" <spitfiresuz@141.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:56:51 -0400; What I find amusing is they used the Triumph motorcycle logo for the rear plate in their "possible concept" rendition. I'll believe it when I see it! Neat article, though. :) Susan :) http://netcars.; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00165.html (8,507 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: "Scott Janzen" <S.Janzen@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:59:50 -0400; Looks too much like a Saturn or Pontiac from the rear. BMW pulled it off with the iconic Mini shape and proportions but it may be harder to do with Triumph, unless they focus on the TR6 styling which; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00166.html (8,586 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:19:54 -0400 (EDT); Note that the GM "Kappa" platform is sold in Europe as the Opel GT (or is to be sold soon) but taking pix of those cars and "doctoring" them should be dead nuts simple. Of course GM is not BMW, so th; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00167.html (8,757 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <billb@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:21:33 -0700; I caught that too. Odd that they considered the Triumph motorcycles to be an impediment to the brand. It's hardly that. _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00168.html (9,318 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <billb@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:23:15 -0700; _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html Fot mailing list Fot@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00169.html (9,428 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: Steven Benford Jr <sbracing@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:41:04 -0700 (PDT); The calendar says October 11 and not April 1st. Would be nice. I noticed the Triumph motorcycle logo as well. Don't you think the BMW marketing folks would have noticed that? Is this for real ? sbrac; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00170.html (8,142 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: "Terry Stetler" <tlizzard@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:45:23 -0400; Looks like British pulp "news" fiction to me. Not that I'm against the idea mind you, but it will be difficult for anyone to unseat the Miata in the North American market. The Miata is just too good; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00171.html (8,897 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:22:17 EDT; And then there is the spectre of a Triumph with a German engine. That makes my skin crawl. But I'm a crumudgon about that sort of thing. ==AM== Don't forget that Triumph was started by Nuremberg-born; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00175.html (8,334 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:24:14 EDT; I caught that too. Odd that they considered the Triumph motorcycles to be an impediment to the brand. It's hardly that. ==AM== Actually, I think the name is fairly well respected for motorcycles as w; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00176.html (8,513 bytes)
11. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: "michael cook" <mlcooknj@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:51:02 -0400; And then there's the German car with a Triumph engine that is fetching incredible sums at auction - and it probably holds water better than the idea of a BMW-built Triumph. Mike Cook And then there i; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00178.html (8,541 bytes)
12. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: "michael cook" <mlcooknj@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:02:04 -0400; Hi All I think I have said this before but .... There is no commercial sense in BMW trying to launch a new Triumph sports car. If it is to be like the originals, "affordable," the potential sales vol; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00179.html (10,508 bytes)
13. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: Susan Kahler <spitfiresuz@141.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:56:40 -0500; GOOD one, Mike! :D Ours has probably valued upward 150-200% since we got it in 2001. ;) Susan :) -- ** Never argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. *; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00180.html (10,332 bytes)
14. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: "michael cook" <mlcooknj@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:05:07 -0400; Smart and incisive analysis! You can judge the value of the article by the fact that the people don't even know the difference in the logos. Ain't gonna happen. I'll even bet $$$ on it. (anybody got; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00181.html (9,205 bytes)
15. Re: [Fot] New Triumph by BMW ? (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:06:07 EDT; I think I have said this before but .... There is no commercial sense in BMW trying to launch a new Triumph sports car. If it is to be like the originals, "affordable," the potential sales volume cou; /html/fot/2007-10/msg00190.html (9,726 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]