Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+O\/D\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+O\/D\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:39:28 +0100; 4 speed DOG box is the only way to go .......IMHO _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html http://www.fot-racing.com Fot@autox.team.net http://; /html/fot/2009-12/msg00299.html (6,393 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:36:23 +0100; == Interesting. I've made up my mind, and know where most of the tires stand in relation to each other from the SCCA IT and SM world. Due to vintage organizations' tire rules on the east coast, compe; /html/fot/2009-12/msg00300.html (8,522 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: "WILLIAM TOBIN" <william.tobin3@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:52:22 -0500; I vote for the CR set. Less weight and less parts to break. Still using Kastner 1.88 1st CR set with modified laygear bearings. Jeff D. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T You are subscribed as rodkent@cox.n; /html/fot/2009-12/msg00302.html (7,074 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: Tony and Annie Garmey <horizonracing@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:23:23 -0800; I'm happily using my OD but driving a TR4. I could imagine that a 6 have even more profit from because of the extra power and gearing on long straights. While others smashing their engines at 7000 rp; /html/fot/2009-12/msg00303.html (8,051 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: Kas Kastner <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:08:21 -0800; But does that give you the 0.80 overdrive gear? Scott --Original Message-- From: fot-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:fot-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of jeff_durant@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, D; /html/fot/2009-12/msg00304.html (8,209 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: <rodkent@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:58:35 -0500; I am in the process of replacing the bushes in the front and back eyes of my rear leaf springs. In doing so, I realized that the rear shackle was easy to detach but the spring won't come off of the f; /html/fot/2009-12/msg00305.html (8,487 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: Steven Belfer <colordog.1@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:12:57 -0800; Definitely should stay put. In fact, there is supposed to be a flat on the head of the pin, and a matching tab on the frame, to keep it from rotating. But if it's not clamped firmly together, the pi; /html/fot/2009-12/msg00309.html (7,782 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: "Norlin Engineering" <norlinengineering@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:16:23 -0800; Only if your math isn't so good. 3.45/3.70 = .93, not .80 Randall _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html http://www.fot-racing.com Fot@autox; /html/fot/2009-12/msg00314.html (6,772 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: "Terry Stetler" <tlizzard@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:27:46 -0500; I use one and it's great, half the weight too. jg --Original Message-- From: fot-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:fot-bounces@autox.team .net] On Behalf Of Dennis DeLap Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 20; /html/fot/2009-12/msg00315.html (7,158 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] O/D (score: 1): Author: Steven Belfer <colordog.1@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 09:28:54 -0800; Hi, By my notes, there could be two different sized bolts. 7/16 bolts get torqued to 75 ft/lb and 3/8 bolts tightened to 45 ft/lb. Also you probably found out that the "O" ring between the halves is; /html/fot/2010-01/msg00034.html (9,377 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]