Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+PAECO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+PAECO\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:32:05 -0400; I cannot speak for PAECO's other products, but I bought a set of short velocity stacks for the 3 DCOEs. None of them fit; the OD-ID dimension varied by 5-15 thous between each stack, always too thic; /html/fot/2007-06/msg00123.html (7,075 bytes)
2. [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: Joe Alexander <n197tr4@cs.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:29:49 -0400 (EDT); Other than some other similar remarks, this is the first that PAECO has come up in a long time. I have not (knowingly) bought anything from them, so I have nothing to say. Does any one have anything; /html/fot/2012-04/msg00071.html (14,114 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:46:36 -0700; I used to receive their catalogues bu their prices always seemed incredibly high and I never bought anything from them because of that. Joe C. _______________________________________________ fot@auto; /html/fot/2012-04/msg00072.html (15,177 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: Henry Morrison <dos_gusanos@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:03:54 -0600; I have a brand new PAECO cam for my MG motor that I got in a pile of parts and am wondering if I shoul put it in the engine.................................Henry Morrison high and I never bought anyt; /html/fot/2012-04/msg00073.html (16,767 bytes)
5. [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: Joe Alexander <n197tr4@cs.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:39:30 -0400 (EDT); A short review of PAECO website: Might be worth a trip through it just for entertainment. They might have some interesting stuff on the shelf, including some Titanium parts. There's a GT6 CRANKSHAFT; /html/fot/2012-04/msg00075.html (10,660 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: Jeff Senty <gp89@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:44:48 -0400 (EDT); My experience with them was less than poor. I had a Paeco built engine in my first Spit. Lots of bad reviews. Jeff Senty _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.; /html/fot/2012-04/msg00078.html (11,736 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: Mike Munson <fasttrs@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:08:22 -0700 (PDT); I saw a flywheel for a TR6 made by them back in the early nineties that was made from some sort of soft aluminum. The ring gear was loose (before it was even installed on the car) and it was a loose; /html/fot/2012-04/msg00080.html (14,381 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: <riverside@southslope.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:44:44 -0500; I bought some totally unusable TR3 intake valves back in 1970. Never heard a good word. I'd put that cam in a cam Dr. and have all lobes hardness checked and if all is well still be scared stiff. art; /html/fot/2012-04/msg00082.html (14,355 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@spitfire4.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:34:36 -0500; Let's see. My PAECO Spitfire "full race" engine: . Layers of oil-soaked dirt in the oil pan . Wrong front plate (TR4 plate, which lacked the engine mounts) . Burr in #1 lifter hole caused stuck lifte; /html/fot/2012-04/msg00084.html (15,136 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] PAECO (score: 1): Author: "tylerpthompson@yahoo.com" <tylerpthompson@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:20:52 -0600; I am going to get another cam! Ty Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4GLTE smartphone Let's see. My PAECO Spitfire "full race" engine: . Layers of oil-soaked dirt in the oil pan . Wrong front plate (TR4 p; /html/fot/2012-04/msg00086.html (15,464 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]