Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Roller\s+life\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Roller\s+life\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: Jim Cun <jimcun2001@yahoo.com.au>; Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:20:29 -0700 (PDT); G'day guys, Wanted to find out opinions on using solid lifters and a roller cam? Jim Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00083.html (6,720 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: "Gary" <vintage.racer@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:40:28 -0700; Roller rockers in vintage racing? How dare you! Gary _______________________________________________ Fot mailing list Fot@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00085.html (7,393 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <billb@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 16:06:46 -0700; I assume you mean flat tappets, or are you just asking about solid versus hydraulic lifters? If you mean flat tappets I don't think it will work very well. Roller cams ground for roller lifters take; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00088.html (8,225 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: Jim Cun <jimcun2001@yahoo.com.au>; Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:50:42 -0700 (PDT); Just a question. So I guess that you are not in favour of this technology? Not roller rockers but roller cam and solid roller lifters. I already use roller rockers "sham on me" and I am smiling :) J; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00093.html (8,109 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: Jim Cun <jimcun2001@yahoo.com.au>; Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:55:20 -0700 (PDT); I did mean solid roller lifters with a roller cam. Thanks for your response it is clearer to me now. The knowledge and the sharing of it is just great! Thanks. Jim I assume you mean flat tappets, or; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00094.html (9,079 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 01:40:07 -0500; Looking at the profile of a roller cam, it looks like a flat lifter will not work on a roller cam. The shape of the lobe is quite different. The lobe shape on a roller cam is shaped kind of like a fi; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00099.html (8,328 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 01:51:43 -0500; Further on this subject - you can see a picture of what happens at http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/techarticles/95258_hydraulic_roller_cams/ uncle jack -- No Virus Found In This Message Scanned at; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00100.html (8,044 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: Jim Cun <jimcun2001@yahoo.com.au>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 02:14:59 -0700 (PDT); I thought as much it would need to be a roller lifter to make it work. Did a little bit of research here in OZ and seems it would be quite costly. Had a rough cost of $4500 AUS dollars and lot of tr; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00101.html (8,896 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: Jim Cun <jimcun2001@yahoo.com.au>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 02:17:13 -0700 (PDT); Thanks Jack do you think this is a worthwhile modification? Further on this subject - you can see a picture of what happens at http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/techarticles/95258_hydraulic_roller_ca; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00102.html (8,395 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <billb@bnj.com>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 06:31:15 -0700; You won't see a huge increase in power from adding a roller cam. I don't remember what engine you're using, but the increase in flow created by having longer duration enabled by the steep lifting ram; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00110.html (11,010 bytes)
11. Re: [Fot] Roller life (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 09:38:07 -0500; The incentive for doing a roller cam is less for a TR3/4 engine than for a SBC due to the diameter of the lifters (0.935 for TR, 0.842 for SBC). The larger lifters allows you to use a more aggressive; /html/fot/2007-05/msg00119.html (9,949 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]