Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+SVRA\s+allows\s+5\s+speed\s+transmission\s+conversion\!\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "RACER BUD" <budscars@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:01:58 -0800
It has been suggested that it probably is not against the 1969 GCRs to use a 5 sppedin our carsaslong as firstgear is locked out--meaning four forward gears without overdrive. Thoughts? Chuck -- Chuc
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00086.html (10,990 bytes)

2. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@spitfire4.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:47:33 -0600
I certainly favor it, though I've managed to have a reasonably reliable TR4-based box using quaife dog-engagement straight cut gears. But that's an expensive proposition and the reliability suffers w
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00087.html (10,816 bytes)

3. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "David W. Riddle" <dave@microworks.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:52:04 -0700
Bill Babcock Babcock & Jenkins Billb@bnj.com 503.936.7660 www.bnj.com Editor Ke Nalu e-Magazine Paddlesurfing's Web Journal Bill@kenalu.com www.kenalu.com blog: www.ponohouse.com/ponoblog ___________
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00088.html (6,902 bytes)

4. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Arnold <triosan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:07:23 -0800
The difference in reliability between a TR gearbox and a GT6 gearbox, even with TR7 internals, is night and day... chris _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.t
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00090.html (11,283 bytes)

5. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <Billb@bnj.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:12:28 -1000
Y'all need to go the www.svra.com and re-read the regulations...or could it be that you haven't ever really read them? THE ALTERNATE TRANSMISSION RULE HAS BEEN IN EFFECT SINCE 1999! Look under the Gr
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00091.html (11,797 bytes)

6. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <Billb@bnj.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:16:49 -1000
That "B" is a typo! Y'all need to go the www.svra.com and re-read the regulations...or could it be that you haven't ever really read them? THE ALTERNATE TRANSMISSION RULE HAS BEEN IN EFFECT SINCE 199
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00092.html (9,110 bytes)

7. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: tr3a58@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:03:13 -0600 (CST)
Speaking as the Race Director of one of those "national captioning vintage race groups", whatever that means, you need to understand and appreciate that every organization sets its own policies on ca
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00093.html (10,919 bytes)

8. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:27:25 -0800 (PST)
Mike, your comments are well thought out and put. Then it can be said without contradiction that we all race TRIUMPHs, more or less. Some more so, some less so. Bill (Damdinger) ** The year's hottest
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00094.html (8,902 bytes)

9. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: jwoesvra@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:27:37 -0500
CVAR has an "OEM" requirement, meaning a Triumph tranny. --Original Message-- From: fot-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:fot-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Arnold Sent: Tuesday, February 10
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00095.html (11,917 bytes)

10. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: jwoesvra@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:32:00 -0500
Since the original 4-speed plus OD gives 7 distinct ratios, that same logic would seem to indicate that a 7-speed manual would also be acceptable. Or 8, if your lockout switch happens to be misadjus
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00096.html (12,463 bytes)

11. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: Mike Jackson <grandwazoo@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:43:32 -0500 (EST)
I'm kind of an outsider here, so no particular axe to grind ... but isn't that why they call it "vintage" racing? I thought the goal was to have fun with old cars; not bolt some reproduction sheet m
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00097.html (13,838 bytes)

12. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: BillDentin@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:56:08 EST
Not sure which motor you are working on, Greg, but not too many years ago I walked into a Kragen (same chain as Checker and Shucks) and asked for a front seal for a TR4. They had two of them in stoc
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00098.html (9,697 bytes)

13. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:33:07 -0800
This is where the vintage racing gets very confusing, and can be very disheartning to those of us with Truly period correct cars...and of course, we have no National Governing Organization....I would
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00100.html (9,763 bytes)

14. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:42:01 -0800
Absolutly true and in our own ranks no doubt. I found it difficult to buy 87MM forged pistons but the supplier had plenty of 89 MM sets due to the demand from racers.. This is where the vintage racin
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00101.html (9,748 bytes)

15. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:48 -0800
_______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html http://www.fot-racing.com Fot mailing list Fot@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/f
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00102.html (7,033 bytes)

16. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "Kas Kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:53 -0800
I meant numerically HIGHER....like 1:10 to 1. 5th MUST be numerically lower (i.e. .095:1) Y'all need to go the www.svra.com and re-read the regulations...or could it be that you haven't ever really r
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00103.html (13,507 bytes)

17. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "RACER BUD" <budscars@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:56:50 -0800
Stating gear ratios is my weak point too, Kas! To: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; <fot@autox.team.net>B Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:56 AMB isn'tB ___________________________________________
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00104.html (10,833 bytes)

18. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "Kramer, Robert" <RKramer@rdoequipment.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:02:27 -0600
This falls between the "good point except" and the "slippery slope" categories. No one requires full OEM vintage. If they did there would be very few running production-based cars. The megabuck cars
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00105.html (11,333 bytes)

19. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: "Kas Kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:08:56 -0800
Don't some of the GT6 vintage racers use a TR456 gearbox? How difficult is that to do? Seems like that would be the best solution to Bobby's problem. _______________________________________________ S
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00106.html (11,602 bytes)

20. Re: [Fot] SVRA allows 5 speed transmission conversion! (score: 1)
Author: jwoesvra@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:11:14 -0500
We have some nice race car pics up but no street cars yet. I pretty much have the go-ahead for the autocross, now I just need to arrange it. We'll probably have it on Monday and it will be right in t
/html/fot/2009-02/msg00107.html (12,221 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu