- 1. [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Bartlett <BillBartlett@wingnutracing.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 08:46:04 -0400
- It took me several years racing to figure out I needed professional help. Building race engines I mean. I built a lot of street engines that lasted forever but proved I couldn't keep a high-CR race e
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00286.html (9,648 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: "MSCC News" <garygret@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:24:13 -0500
- Tnx Larry. So I guess these were "lightened". Hmmph. -- J.C. Hassall Blacksburg VA '63 TR4 in autox preparation 96% finished, 90% to go _______________________________________________ Support Team.Ne
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00290.html (8,130 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kas Kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 12:31:18 -0700
- No. It is not an "internal" thing - meaning that you are sending to yourself. Rather as I indicated in that email to you off-list two hours ago... -- As a Web/email host provider what we generally se
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00292.html (13,138 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@spitfire4.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:55:32 -0500
- Just to echo what others have said; it's most likely some other machine sending spam with your return address. There is effective nothing in the email system that ensures that the "return" address m
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00293.html (9,464 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: "J.C. Hassall" <jhassall@blacksburg.net>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:38:35 -0400
- True, and Good advice .... My problem with the blocking is that I am now corresponding with people in Russia and the Ukraine, so I cannot conveniently block those addresses ... oh well :>((( ... I ju
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00294.html (8,222 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: Gt6steve@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:11:27 EDT
- not since I started blocking most of Russia, Turkistan, etc. The advice below is true, and Good advice .... My problem with the blocking is that I am now corresponding with people in Russia and the U
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00295.html (10,135 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: "David W. Riddle" <dave@microworks.net>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:26:07 -0700
- This has screwed me up in the past, when my ISP was transmitting through his own domain name, another of his clients was (purportedly) sending spam, so since my messages were in the same IP address r
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00296.html (11,954 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:59:28 -0700
- This topic reminds me that I've been meaning to write up some stuff about how Team.Net works, the reasons for various things and such. Maybe if I don't spend all night watching Iron Chef episodes on
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00297.html (7,536 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: tom strange <tstrange@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
- I too have a new set of BP Northwest lifters that are going into my new engine build. We shall see what happens. Their website states their hardness specs and since this is a mild race engine, I'm ta
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00298.html (9,435 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Fot] Weird spam messages? (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg \"Lunker\" Hilyer" <Lunkercars@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 21:14:54 -0600
- Interestingly I was just sent a link to an article from the New York Times on professions that involve getting dirt under your fingernails. I think it sums up why we build our own stuff. There is a n
- /html/fot/2009-05/msg00316.html (10,365 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu