Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+drag\s+co\-efficient\s+and\s+frontal\s+area\s+data\s+for\s+selected\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Horstkorta" <vintage.racer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:46:59 -0700
It's impossible to calculate the Drag Coefficient of a TR3. . . . it's far too high. Jack TR's 3&8 I thought this might be of interest. http://www.mayfco.com/triumph.htm Does anyone know where I can
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00141.html (6,592 bytes)

2. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Murphy" <timmurph@fastbytes.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:55:55 -0500
Folks: My 1296 pulls easily to 7000 rpm, slowing 90 hp on the chassis dyno and Fuel/Air at 13.0. At 7,000 I abruptly lose 20 hp and the fuel/air goes to 17. I get the same affect on 1 1/2 and 1 1/4 S
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00142.html (6,296 bytes)

3. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:47:45 -0700
I assume you are serious, do the calculations for drag come apart at higher drag numbers, like pipe turbulence does? Bill Babcock Babcock & Jenkins Billb@bnj.com 503.936.7660 www.bnj.com ___________
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00144.html (7,464 bytes)

4. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: "Jack Brooks" <jibjib@att.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:26:40 -0700
Why would it be any higher than a TR4? -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Babcock" <billbab@gmail.com> To: <billdentin@aol.com> Cc: <fot@autox.team.net> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 1:41 AM Subject: R
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00145.html (7,226 bytes)

5. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: dale oesterle <dale.oesterle@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Barn door vs. kitchen door. TR4s were the "aeorodynamic, modern" Bill Babcock Babcock & Jenkins Billb@bnj.com 503.936.7660 www.bnj.com _______________________________________________ http://www.team.
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00146.html (6,883 bytes)

6. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: BillDentin@aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:45:34 EDT
Possibly resonance, you might be getting a node right around the jet area. You could try a different trumpet and see what happens--anything that changes the length of the intake should change the res
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00147.html (8,070 bytes)

7. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: "Steven Preiss" <spreiss@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:50:21 +1100
Lack of fuel? More pump pressure - larger float valve - larger connection between float chamber and jet? Hope this helps? Chris --Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-- Von: fot-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:fot
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00149.html (8,388 bytes)

8. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <billbab@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:07:17 -0700
Red Triumph Vitesse = flying brick. No comment on the CD, but as it somehow gets all the way up to 120mph before the front starts to lift, (dangerously), I class that as nothing short of a miracle, (
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00151.html (7,347 bytes)

9. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: BillDentin@aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:11:28 EDT
Wow, about half way thru the season and there's a 3 way tie for the points lead...Hamilton, Massa and Raikkomen at 48 with Kubica only 2 points off at 46. I tried watching the race last Sunday (Briti
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00152.html (8,699 bytes)

10. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Cypher (SpitfireRacer)" <srcypher@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:04:36 -0400
The FOX-carried F1 races run on a fox affiliate on Sunday and speedvision on wednesday. I avoided F1 news until wednesday because I haven't figured out how to get the FOX show tivo'ed. It was a great
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00165.html (7,290 bytes)

11. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: "Don Marshall" <ofbracing@nefcom.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:40:30 -0400
_______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html Fot mailing list Fot@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00174.html (9,317 bytes)

12. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: "Russ Moore" <rem9@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:31:26 -0400
Is that with the stock windscreen, or racing screens? My mirrors probably add another 0.1. Same problem, the car can be reconfigured for measurable changes in Cd. Spats, tonneau cover, etc. I believ
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00176.html (6,630 bytes)

13. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Wow. I LOVE Uma Thurmann. I'm pretty sure she digs me too. :) - Tony _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html Fot mailing list Fot@autox.team.net http://autox.t
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00177.html (9,555 bytes)

14. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: WEmery7451@aol.com
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:16:55 EDT
Some folk suggested terminating the vent line with a air filter. Expensive. Use a gas filter. Cheaper and does a better job. Shane Ingate in dusty NM ________________________________________________
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00196.html (9,041 bytes)

15. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: Shane Ingate <hottr6@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:09:57 -0400
A few folks reported that they couldn't find the link to the classifieds, so if you want to peek at the GT3 TR6 advert, try this: http://www.ner.org/forums/index.php/topic,56.0.html rml -- Bob Lang
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00200.html (7,780 bytes)

16. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:44:53 -0500
The TR3 test was for a small mouth. All of these early road tests seem to have used a 3.7 rearend. Based on the graphs in the articles, 3.7 OD was perfect for the Jabekke runs (max power at max speed
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00203.html (10,662 bytes)

17. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:43:45 -0400 (EDT)
Any other suggestion as to why the Cd is so different, then? It doesn't seem like moving the grille back to front would make such a dramatic difference, and AFAIK the sheet metal was nearly identica
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00204.html (7,211 bytes)

18. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:57:25 -0400 (EDT)
How is this Cd measurement taken? _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html Fot mailing list Fot@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00205.html (7,077 bytes)

19. Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected (score: 1)
Author: "Terry Stetler" <tlizzard@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:08:37 -0400
Can someone walk me through how to test a valve spring? I have the spring tester you put in a vice as well as the kind you use with a torque wrench. In either case, I need to know the compression len
/html/fot/2008-07/msg00206.html (10,250 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu