Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+leakdown\s+tester\,\s+follow\-on\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+leakdown\s+tester\,\s+follow\-on\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] leakdown tester, follow-on question (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:29:19 -0500; The "normal" way to do this test is to set the piston at top dead center. But if you take the rocker assembly loose, then all the valves are closed. Doing it this way, cam position is eliminated as a; /html/fot/2007-09/msg00315.html (8,009 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] leakdown tester, follow-on question (score: 1): Author: "riverside" <riverside@cedar-rapids.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:55:38 -0500; I like about 1 inch down in the bore to 1.75. this is where it counts. OHC motors hard to loosen, but easy to see. full degree marks on the damper a big help _________________________________________; /html/fot/2007-09/msg00316.html (9,308 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] leakdown tester, follow-on question (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <billb@bnj.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:59:56 -0700; Nope, sounds like a lot of work. What are you getting at--you think the sleeves are wiggly? You're right. As I think Joe discovered when he was looking into restoring cylinders, you need a torque pla; /html/fot/2007-09/msg00317.html (9,455 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] leakdown tester, follow-on question (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:32:18 EDT; "As I think Joe discovered when he was looking into restoring cylinders, you need a torque plate to bore or hone them. " Bill, The method of clamping we have now replicates what we used in the JOHN D; /html/fot/2007-09/msg00318.html (9,181 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] leakdown tester, follow-on question (score: 1): Author: Fubog1@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:04:33 EDT; We did extensive testing with both Torque Plate Joe I'm curious how thick is your torque plate? Glen _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html Fot mailing list F; /html/fot/2007-09/msg00319.html (7,793 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] leakdown tester, follow-on question (score: 1): Author: Gt6steve@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:36:03 EDT; I was gonna buy a torque plate for the sixes the other day. Would you believe $800.00? I'm back to watching for big pieces of stock... We did extensive testing with both Torque Plate Joe I'm curious; /html/fot/2007-09/msg00320.html (7,894 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] leakdown tester, follow-on question (score: 1): Author: "BOB KRAMER" <rkramer3@austin.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:58:58 -0500; Did this testing include the plate I sent you? Being as how it is around 2 inches thick I expected that it would work well. I like to know how it compares to the Deere method and what I am losing. B; /html/fot/2007-09/msg00327.html (8,861 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] leakdown tester, follow-on question (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:39:56 EDT; Yes! I think the plate I have is around 2" thick, too....from Mordy Dunst. I have not measured it yet for Glen. You are not likely to be losing anything. Or very little. Or maybe it is even better wh; /html/fot/2007-09/msg00328.html (9,243 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] leakdown tester, follow-on question (score: 1): Author: Fubog1@aol.com; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:31:54 EDT; Yes! I think the plate I have is around 2" thick, too....from Mordy Dunst. I have not measured it yet for Glen. You are not likely to be losing anything. Or very little. Or maybe it is even better wh; /html/fot/2007-09/msg00332.html (8,687 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]