Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+need\s+GT6\+\s+3\.89\s+r\&p\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+need\s+GT6\+\s+3\.89\s+r\&p\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] need GT6+ 3.89 r&p (score: 1): Author: Tony and Annie Garmey <horizonracing@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:53:11 -0800; Is there a difference between a GT6+ 3.89 and a Spitfire 1500 3.89 ? _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html http://www.fot-racing.com Fot@aut; /html/fot/2009-11/msg00146.html (6,417 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] need GT6+ 3.89 r&p (score: 1): Author: Brad Kahler <bkahler1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:51:36 -0500; Yes, but the Spit box will fit the GT6 :-) There are some detail changes (spring mounting) and some component changes in the later rear axle, mostly for the better (as I recall, the stub axle shafts; /html/fot/2009-11/msg00147.html (7,988 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] need GT6+ 3.89 r&p (score: 1): Author: Mike Munson <fasttrs@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:57:03 -0500 (GMT-05:00); thank you for stating it so well Joe Does any one have the bits for a 6 -- Original Message -- From: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net> To: <fot@autox.team.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:0; /html/fot/2009-11/msg00148.html (7,341 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]