Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+spitfire\s+woes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+spitfire\s+woes\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] spitfire woes (score: 1): Author: "Ken Gano palm top" <triumphs@consolidated.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:30:33 -0500; Jack (Ken)... Drop any decimal, and put your paper in the landscape position. Bill (Damdinger) ** Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music scene in your area - Check out TourTra; /html/fot/2008-07/msg00143.html (7,038 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] spitfire woes (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <billbab@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:41:01 -0700; Might be my MASONRY background, but I always felt the TR2-TR6 were all 'bricks'. The TR7 struck me as aerodynamic. I always thought the TR7 had a heavy design influence on the entire auto industry du; /html/fot/2008-07/msg00148.html (8,268 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] spitfire woes (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <billbab@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:57:01 -0700; I had always heard that the Jags were designed by the senior aerodynamic designers of the highest caliber, and when it came time to design the MG's, the gave the chore to the junior designers and the; /html/fot/2008-07/msg00150.html (9,218 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] spitfire woes (score: 1): Author: "RACER BUD" <budscars@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:18:21 -0700; I was there in the rain at the Silverstone Racing Club's .... watching them all come through Brooklands, round Luffield and Club ..... where Massa spun a few times (and Webber) .... Hamilton was peer; /html/fot/2008-07/msg00157.html (8,188 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] spitfire woes (score: 1): Author: "Norlin Engineering" <norlinengineering@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:47:53 -0700; What is your Fuel Pressure??? John W. Spitfire #892 DP 240z CP -- Original Message -- From: "dale oesterle" <dale.oesterle@sbcglobal.net> To: "fot" <fot@autox.team.net> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008; /html/fot/2008-07/msg00160.html (8,224 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] spitfire woes (score: 1): Author: "TR4Tony" <tr4.tony@virgin.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:44:29 +0100; Is valve float likely? I've not personally seen how that show on a Thanks -S Scott Cypher SCCA #562573 HP Spitfire 1500 #57 _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.; /html/fot/2008-07/msg00161.html (9,453 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] spitfire woes (score: 1): Author: "David W. Riddle" <dave@microworks.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:33:44 -0700; As you sometimes are refering about crank scrapers and sump bevels....did one ever test them? This is how to do: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fv53RbvgfGc& Cheers Chris _____________________________; /html/fot/2008-07/msg00162.html (6,828 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] spitfire woes (score: 1): Author: "John W" <john@race-dogs.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:20:29 -0700; Nope, I missed adding the <grin>. Sorry. I've always felt the 3 was an aerodynamic nightmare, but in reality, it may be better than the 4-6's. It would be interesting to get a side by side compariso; /html/fot/2008-07/msg00164.html (8,378 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] spitfire woes (score: 1): Author: fpspitfire@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:45:57 +0000; Thanks to Mr. Marx, we were recently given a Triumph tour at speed around the Nurburgring. For a slightly different perspective, ie, faster, have a look at this 7:26.4 minute lap in a Corvette ZR-1 w; /html/fot/2008-07/msg00167.html (7,940 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]