Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+2\.6\s+engine\s+rebuild\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+2\.6\s+engine\s+rebuild\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Austin Healey <pajtamuvek@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:47:35 +0100; I am planning an adventure. I have bought a 2.6 engine in the UK for my bn4 to replace the non-original 2.9 now fitted. Instead of shipping it home and reconditioning it here, I have decided to trav; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00450.html (7,556 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:59:59 +0100; Hi Gergo, Congratulations, it seems you have found your engine. Which head do you use now, two or six port? You also need the right carbs + inlet manifold for your 100/6. AH Spares is about an hour`s; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00451.html (8,283 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:35:22 +0100; Op 20-12-2010 9:59, Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com schreef: Not these days. You cannot even decently travel at all at the moment. Kees Oudesluijs [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00452.html (6,910 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: John Harper <ah@jharper.demon.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:26:36 +0000; I used an engine reconditioner recently who could find almost anything and had a long list of contacts and found all that was needed for my engine very quickly. He also, because of his long backgrou; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00453.html (8,185 bytes)
5. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Austin Healey <pajtamuvek@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:23:49 +0100; Hi Josef, This was by bare accident. I have found one on ebay for a very good price (embrassingly low I mean). It is a late 2.6 block from an unknown car (maybe A105?) with 6 port head. The engine nu; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00455.html (9,478 bytes)
6. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Austin Healey <pajtamuvek@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:50 +0100; Unfortunatly this engine reconditioner has not firsthand expeiences with the C-series. I think its my share to get hold of the parts needed. Though I would be realy gratefull for any hints what to lo; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00456.html (8,985 bytes)
7. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: I Erbs <eyera3@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:24:33 -0800; I am unclear why you are doing this? Are wanting a concourse show car? This seems like a great expense to downgrade your car from the better 3000 set up IMHO. Adventure indeed! Keep is informed as t; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00459.html (9,468 bytes)
8. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Robert Blair <rnbmail@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:54:53 -0800 (PST); Simple - SC Parts is not too far - and have everything. Work Phone: 011-44-1293-847-200 Robert N. Blair Yellow 65BJ8 RNBmail@yahoo.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/rnbmail@yahoo.com; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00464.html (9,525 bytes)
9. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Henry Dodson" <hcdodson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:32:18 -0800; Buyer beware when dealing with SC. Hank -- Original Message -- From: "Robert Blair" <rnbmail@yahoo.com> To: "Healey List" <healeys@autox.team.net>; "Austin Healey" <pajtamuvek@gmail.com> Sent: Monday; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00466.html (10,711 bytes)
10. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Austin Healey <pajtamuvek@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:35 +0100; Hello Ira, Being honest I have also lamented on this engine problem for a while before making my decision. This is my first Healey. I hope not the last :). I am restoring cars as a passion. I did som; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00470.html (11,442 bytes)
11. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: richard mayor <mayorrichard@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:25:46 +0000; Why is a 3000 engine better than a 2.6? First, the engines are virtually identical on the exterior. The only visible difference is the boss on the block where the engine number plate is placed. Only; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00476.html (10,628 bytes)
12. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:56:35 +0800; I've driven both 3000's and 100/6s, also 100/6s with gallery heads. At the end of the day, the difference in power between all the different versions isn't all that noticeable for every day driving.; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00477.html (9,945 bytes)
13. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: I Erbs <eyera3@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:00:20 -0800; I would really think this through in light of you desire to sell it at some future date. The 3000 engine has more BHP. If the current engine is in running condition, you will be ahead of the game as; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00478.html (9,349 bytes)
14. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Rich Chrysler" <richchrysler@quickclic.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:34:12 -0500; There is very little difference between a stock later 100/Six engine at 117 BHP and the early 3000 engine at a stock 124 BHP. Certainly for normal road use the noticeable difference would be very li; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00480.html (8,919 bytes)
15. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: I Erbs <eyera3@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:38:29 -0800; My question to him has always been.... If the 3000 engine is good, there is no reason short of concourse judging to switch out the engine. if it is beyond rebuilding, then sure get an original or 300; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00481.html (8,823 bytes)
16. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Austin Healey <pajtamuvek@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:49:33 +0100; Thanks everybody for the input. I only sell my cars to be able to switch to the next project. Soo overall value is not all that important. My fun needs the original 2.6 engine, soo if only possible,; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00490.html (9,667 bytes)
17. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:51:47 +0100; here in continental Europe we can realise its going different to your opinion. A 100/6 is more worth with an original 2.6 engine, than with a 2.9 engine. Also owners go back to drum brakes in the fr; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00491.html (9,865 bytes)
18. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Martin Jansen <jule_enterprisesah@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:32:44 -0800 (PST); After reading various postings I realize there are two groups of people owning healeys. One group are what I call "Car guys" guys who love cars and what they can do , The second group are historians; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00498.html (11,138 bytes)
19. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: I Erbs <eyera3@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:42:01 -0800; Our hobby has room for all, that's what so amazing about this. Thanks to all who contribute Ira Erbs Digs 4 Solutions Computer Consultants Portland, OR On Dec 21, 2010 9:32 PM, "Martin Jansen" <jule_; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00499.html (11,657 bytes)
20. Re: [Healeys] 2.6 engine rebuild (score: 1): Author: Roland Wilhelmy <rwil@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:00:41 -0800; One of the things I like about all Big Healeys is that they can keep up with modern traffic. We're not talking about MG TCs, which I like but wouldn't want to drive on a Southern California freeway e; /html/healeys/2010-12/msg00500.html (9,884 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]