Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+BJ8\s+Ride\s+Height\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+BJ8\s+Ride\s+Height\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] BJ8 Ride Height (score: 1): Author: Charlie Frazer <cfrazer@jcomm.uoregon.edu>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:26:49 -0700; According to the archives, back in July '06 KingR44916 asked... "after installing new rear springs on my bj8 the ride height is 29 in it seems alittle high ,tires don't full up the wheel well i'm run; /html/healeys/2008-04/msg00713.html (6,628 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] BJ8 Ride Height (score: 1): Author: "Alan Seigrist" <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:32:03 +0800; Well 205 65s are a low profile tire and they will look too small for the car no matter what. 165s are ok if mounted on 4.5"rims, but are still about a quarter of an inch shorter than the original dun; /html/healeys/2008-04/msg00714.html (7,938 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] BJ8 Ride Height (score: 1): Author: Robert Blair <rnbmail@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:30:58 -0700 (PDT); The rear ride height on the late BJ8s were raised by the factory using a suspension mod after multiple complaints about the low exhaust being bashed too often. The result was an ugly gap between the; /html/healeys/2008-04/msg00725.html (9,354 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]