Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+BN1\s+vs\s+BN2\s+Front\s+Fenders\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+BN1\s+vs\s+BN2\s+Front\s+Fenders\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] BN1 vs BN2 Front Fenders (score: 1): Author: "Doug Newton" <dougnewton@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:10:32 -0500; Good Morning List- I understand that the BN1 Front Fenders are approximately 1 < smaller in wheel well opening than the BN2, but, given that most of our cars are driven on the street (in non high sp; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00580.html (7,342 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] BN1 vs BN2 Front Fenders (score: 1): Author: "Curt/Nancy Arndt" <cnaarndt@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:57:07 -0700; Actually the BN1 wings are 1 1/4 to almost 1 3/4 inches smaller than the BN2 wings. I'll pass this question off to Bill Barnett since he has personal experience with early BN1 wings and fairly aggre; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00585.html (8,450 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] BN1 vs BN2 Front Fenders (score: 1): Author: <glemon@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 9:07:59 -0600; Doug, I autocrossed my Healey 100 with 165/80 15s, 60 spoke wire wheels, and front disc brakes from a later Healey, no clearance problems with the earlier smaller radius front fenders. I alsa had a t; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00588.html (7,362 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] BN1 vs BN2 Front Fenders (score: 1): Author: "Mr. Bill" <BN1@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:40:20 -0700; Hi Curt and List, Actually, I have never had a problem even though I have the smallest openings. Just do your research first. I'm running Dunlop 205/65/15's on Dunlop 6" stainless/chrome 72's. They s; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00597.html (10,055 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]