Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Dealer\s+100\s+M\s+kit\s+\-\s+carbs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Dealer\s+100\s+M\s+kit\s+\-\s+carbs\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Dealer 100 M kit - carbs (score: 1): Author: Randy Hicks <Healey100M@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 20:58:24 -0400; Is there any info out there that indicates exactly what carbs would have been included with the period dealer 100 M kit? AUC 6040 X were on most factory 100 M's but is that what was in the "dealer ki; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00041.html (7,257 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] Dealer 100 M kit - carbs (score: 1): Author: "Curt/Nancy Arndt" <cnaarndt@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 18:47:18 -0700; Most maybe but definitely not all. The important number was the hand scribed (etched) number below that on the carburetor body, i.e., 6047 and 6053. Too many folks get wrapped around the axle about; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00042.html (9,095 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] Dealer 100 M kit - carbs (score: 1): Author: Randy Hicks <Healey100M@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 22:20:23 -0400; Hi Curt, I don't disagree with any of that. But my question is still, what were the carbs that were supplied as part of the Le Mans kit? 6040 X or 6040 AA ? And (now) were they etched with the 6047 &; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00043.html (8,990 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] Dealer 100 M kit - carbs (score: 1): Author: "Curt/Nancy Arndt" <cnaarndt@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 19:54:06 -0700; The 6047 and 5053 are what makes the carburetors 100M versions so I don't see getting around this. Once again, IT DOESN'T MATTER what the AUC 6040 suffix is, if the carbs were produced during the pe; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00044.html (10,590 bytes)
5. Re: [Healeys] Dealer 100 M kit - carbs (score: 1): Author: "Curt/Nancy Arndt" <cnaarndt@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 19:54:38 -0700; Also the carburetor pistons on the 100M are a unique part number and not the same as the TR3 or those on the standard 100 H4s. Curt _______________________________________________ Healeys@autox.team; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00045.html (9,554 bytes)
6. Re: [Healeys] Dealer 100 M kit - carbs (score: 1): Author: "Dave Porter" <frogeye@porterscustom.com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 06:51:55 -0600; In the SU books, they (SU) published a list of applications (vehicles) that were fitted with such and such a model of carb. I can't find mine (not unusual). Perhaps someone has a copy of this list? J; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00046.html (8,426 bytes)
7. Re: [Healeys] Dealer 100 M kit - carbs (score: 1): Author: Chris Dimmock <austin.healey@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 23:49:56 +1000; Can't remember the SU numbers, but the principle is the same as Webers. The "BMC" weber is a 45DCOE Type 13. The weber "body" was fitted to a squillion webers. And it is only cast on the weber lid/ t; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00048.html (8,944 bytes)
8. Re: [Healeys] Dealer 100 M kit - carbs (score: 1): Author: "Curt/Nancy Arndt" <cnaarndt@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 07:32:57 -0700; Dave, Randy and all interested listers, The dealers did not make up the 100M kits supplied to Healey 100s in the mid 1950's. These kits would have been made up and specifically supplied to the dealer; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00052.html (10,420 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]