Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Drive\s+shaft\s+alignment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Drive\s+shaft\s+alignment\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: "Peter Schauss" <rpschauss@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:23:35 -0400; Are the yokes at the front and rear of the drive shaft supposed to be in line or 90 degrees apart? What happens if the two ends are not in the proper relationship to each other? Last year I sent my d; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00647.html (7,470 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: Bob Haskell <rchaskell@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:40:41 -0400; There are two alignment arrows. On the propshaft I looked at, the arrow on the front piece was about mid-span in-line with the grease nipple. On the rear tube, the arrow is just after the weld. I be; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00652.html (7,950 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:03:15 +0800; It's pretty simple, if you have the drive shaft in your hand, the front yoke and rear yoke should be in alignment. That way the drive shaft will take the sinusoidal variation in the rotation by movin; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00654.html (8,749 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:38:13 -0600; Universal joints are NOT constant velocity joints. Sure, if you apply 10 turns at one side, you'll get 10 turns at the other. If you apply a constant 10 rpm at one side, the *average* at the other wi; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00655.html (7,190 bytes)
5. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:21:32 +0200; The two yokes of the Hooke joints on the drive shaft should be in the same position or in line, that way they form a Constant Velocity joint (sort of). If they are out of line you can get serious dri; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00661.html (8,147 bytes)
6. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: "Rich C" <richchrysler@quickclic.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:57:52 -0400; Well, it's all quite easy to rectify. You should be able to unscrew the connecting collar where the drive shaft telescopes on its splines, pull the two sections apart and realign the assembly. Rich _; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00665.html (8,374 bytes)
7. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:25:24 +0200; If after realigning, as Rich suggests, the shaft is causing vibrations, try to realign at 180 degrees. If that fails have it balanced. Kees Oudesluijs NL _____________________________________________; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00668.html (7,753 bytes)
8. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: David Nock <healeydoc@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:15:14 -0700; All driveshafts will be the same no matter if there are 2 or 3 Universals in the shaft. The driving member at each end of the driveshaft must be at 90 degrees to each other. Originally on all British; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00672.html (9,812 bytes)
9. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:27:19 +0200; I must disagree. On all drive shafts I have seen the yokes are paralell to each other. That is also the theory otherwise you cannot have a constant velocity for the in and out going shaft. Kees Oudes; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00677.html (8,907 bytes)
10. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: "Dave Porter" <frogeye@porterscustom.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:15:45 -0600; Have to agree with Kees on this one. frogeye@porterscustom.com Porter Customs 2909 Arno NE Albuquerque, NM USA 87107 505-352-1378 1954 BN2 1959 AN5 Porter Custom Bicycles cars: www.britishcarforum.co; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00680.html (10,310 bytes)
11. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: "Ed Woods" <fogbro1@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:21:52 -0400; Quoting from The Good Book, a.k.a the 3000 Service Manual,: "When replacing the sliding joint on the shaft, be sure that the trunnions in the sliding and fixed yoke are in line. This can be checked; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00683.html (8,300 bytes)
12. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: David Nock <healeydoc@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:05:41 -0700; Sorry I meant to say that the end driving members are parallel _______________________________________________ Healeys@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00689.html (9,196 bytes)
13. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: WILLIAM B LAWRENCE <ynotink@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 03:26:14 +0000; I think Dave Nock's response is correct, but perhaps a little confusing. He says that the DRIVING yokes should be at 90 degrees. The first DRIVING yoke is on the slip joint and transmits torque to th; /html/healeys/2010-04/msg00696.html (12,047 bytes)
14. Re: [Healeys] Drive shaft alignment (score: 1): Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>; Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 10:53:47 +0200; I think you are right. If I read it as you suggest I agree. That is the trouble if English is not your native tongue. Sorry Dave. Kees Oudesluijs NL _______________________________________________ H; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00000.html (7,028 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]