Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Healeys\]\s+Boot\s+pan\s+to\s+shroud\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Healeys\]\s+Boot\s+pan\s+to\s+shroud\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Healeys] Boot pan to shroud (score: 1): Author: john spaur <jmsdarch@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:47:43 -0700; Rust is the problem with this joint, not corrosion! Paint the mating surfaces well. I also ran caulk on the seam, feathered it out and finished it with paint. It's not perfectly finished and I doubt; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00510.html (6,764 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] Healeys] Boot pan to shroud (score: 1): Author: Jaap Aeckerlin <j.aeckerlin@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:27:42 +0200; John, sorry, but I have to disagree. Aluminium (sorry - aluminum) is the weakest of the two mating materials and therefore the main problem with this joint will be the aluminum which will suffer from; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00517.html (8,922 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] Healeys] Boot pan to shroud (score: 1): Author: "BJ8 Healeys" <sbyers@ec.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:18:53 -0400; Jaap, the word "weakest" in your response can be interpreted as meaning the material that is structurally less strong. Comparing aluminium/aluminum to steel, yes, it is structurally weaker. But what; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00519.html (8,700 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] Healeys] Boot pan to shroud (score: 1): Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:24:55 +0000 (UTC); I was going to be pedantic (as usual) and point out that rust IS corrosion, but decided not to. I think John has a good point, at least in my case. When I separated the pan and the shroud there was a; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00520.html (8,505 bytes)
5. Re: [Healeys] Healeys] Boot pan to shroud (score: 1): Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:10:18 +0000 (UTC); Agree on the galvanic scale stuff, so I was surprised--and delighted--that my shroud Al was perfectly intact. Another factor is that bare aluminium instantly forms an oxide layer when exposed to oxyg; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00521.html (9,071 bytes)
6. Re: [Healeys] Healeys] Boot pan to shroud (score: 1): Author: Jaap Aeckerlin <j.aeckerlin@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:52:20 +0200; Steve, you're absolutely right. The only apology I can put forward is that English/American isn't my mother tongue.(How is your Dutch? <grin>) And for your information: in my working days I was selli; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00524.html (10,649 bytes)
7. Re: [Healeys] Healeys] Boot pan to shroud (score: 1): Author: john spaur <jmsdarch@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:50:56 -0700; In my limited experience from having owned two 1962 tricarbs I have found that the riveted aluminum lip and aluminum boot section to be fine. The steel floor pans, however, were rusted though in both; /html/healeys/2010-10/msg00539.html (8,967 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]